Search for: "Doe v. Providence Health Plans" Results 41 - 60 of 3,770
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 6:28 am by Guest Author
  “It does not matter if there is one state or 50 states in the plan—the methodology and the result for any particular state would remain the same” (at 35). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
  However, the commentary in the Proposed Rule states that this threshold question is effectively tied to the sector descriptions in the critical infrastructure Sector-Specific Plans (“SSPs”) that were developed pursuant to PPD-21. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
On that basis it concluded that planning permission would not be granted (24 March 2021). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
In all the relevant cases, plan administrators assessed the medical evidence provided, with job attendance being just one factor among many they considered. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
For the past several years, I have assigned the 2013 decision in LSUC v Melnick as required reading to the upper-year students in my Legal Ethics class at Osgoode. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
It allowed the drug to be used through the 10th week of pregnancy, required only one in-person visit to a health-care provider, and permitted health-care providers who are not physicians to prescribe the drug. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm by Robert Foster and Rachel Schuster
 This is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice and is not intended to form an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Department of Health and Human Services and Drug Enforcement Administration The “Clearly Releasable,” Clearly Nonsense Award: U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]