Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 1 - 20
of 13,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
Does 1-29, the Court quashed all subpoenas served, since the plaintiff had misleadingly represented that it had sued all of the 29 ISP subscribers, when in fact it could only have sued the unknown copyright infringers, not the subscribers.August 10 2012, Memorandum and Order Quashing All Subpoenas var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
Does 1-9, the Columbus, Ohio, case in which the Magistrate Judge had dismissed and severed as to John Does 2-9 due to their misjoinder, but granted the RIAA's motion for discovery, the District Judge sustained the rulings of the Magistrate, over objections from both sides, in a July 29, 2008, decision.Now the RIAA has filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice.July 29, 2008, Decision affirming Magistrate Judge's rulingsNotice of Dismissal… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:54 pm
How does it work? [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 12:27 pm
Does 1-29, Chief Magistrate Judge Leo T. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
LEXIS 29 (January 16, 2008). [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:56 pm
The surviving spouse does not take everything.If a spouse died with a Will, the law controlling this situation is IC 29-1-3-1. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:46 am
Bergeson On March 1, 2019, the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
Does 1-27, the Judge has denied all of the defendants' motions, and ruled that the case may proceed.The Judge agreed with the RIAA on every legal issue presented.October 29, 2008, decision*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing… [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:35 am
., A-1362-09T2, April 29, 2011: The time limit in Rule 4:49-2 [motions for reconsideration] does not apply to interlocutory orders. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Article 3 (1) of Directive 2001/29/EC on the “harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society” legally communicating copyrighted works to the public depends on the copyright holders authorization. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:57 am
Article 3 (1) of Directive 2001/29/EC on the “harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society” legally communicating copyrighted works to the public depends on the copyright holders authorization. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am
It should be noted that the requirements of 29 § paragraph 1 are narrower than those on the right of early termination due to breach of contract (according to § 26 of the Act), which is a direct departure from the EC Directive. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 5:16 pm
Does 1-1017, No. 11-2068, 2011 WL 8179128 (C.D.Ill. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:56 am
Bergeson On January 29, 2019, the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
*UPDATEDRelated posts:- Thematic Focus: Solutions - Pt. 1 (29 Oct. 2018)- Thematic Focus: Solutions - Pt. 2 (U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:54 am
Where officers have probable cause already, the failure of a drug dog to alert does not per se dissipate the probable cause. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:04 pm
The US Trustee moved to dismiss pursuant to Section 109(h)(1). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:58 pm
The Working Party does, however, favor the introduction of a specific provision regarding the right to withdraw consent. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
Does 1-9, the Columbus, Ohio, case targeting Ohio State University, where three defendants --John Does #1, 5, and #9 -- have made motions, the Court has stayed enforcement of its ex parte order.Also we have obtained copies of the motion papers served on behalf of John Does #5 and 9. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:09 pm
Discount Video Center v Does 1-29 Answer Discount Video Center v Does 1 29 Complaint [read post]
