Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 61 - 80 of 13,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
This summary barely does justice to the full piece, which is rich in details and supporting references:1. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
At its Conference on May 29, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the preclusive effect of alternative holdings, preemption of state law nuisance claims under the Clean Air Act, and protection for journalists subpoenaed to reveal the identity of confidential sources. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
This is the second installment of “Petitions to watch” featuring cases up for consideration at the Court’s September 29 “Long Conference. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:57 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On May 16, 2011, the Article 29 Working Party (the “Working Party”) adopted an Opinion on geolocation services on smart mobile devices (the “Opinion”). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The communication under R 60(1) is dated 29 January 2009 and was sent by registered mail. [read post]
29 May 2020, 2:43 pm
That obligation does not involve any promise to answer for the debt of another, and the statute of frauds therefore does not apply. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:40 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On June 24, 2010, the Article 29 Working Party adopted Opinion 2/2010 (the “Opinion”) providing further clarification on online behavioral advertising. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:04 am
Safe Harbor Requirements Article 30, Paragraph 1 of the Korean Patent Act provides a safe harbor provision allowing an applicant to maintain the novelty of their invention if the patent application is filed within six months of the date that the novelty was destroyed, per Article 29(1), and if the circumstances of the events satisfy any of the following: when a person with the right to obtain a patent causes the invention to fall under either subparagraph of Article… [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:41 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Article 29 Working Party (the “Working Party”) recently released its August 1, 2014 statement providing recommendations on the actions that EU Member States should take in light of the European Court of Justice’s April 8, 2014 ruling invalidating the EU Data Retention Directive (the “Ruling”). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:41 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Article 29 Working Party (the “Working Party”) recently released its August 1, 2014 statement providing recommendations on the actions that EU Member States should take in light of the European Court of Justice’s April 8, 2014 ruling invalidating the EU Data Retention Directive (the “Ruling”). [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
October 1, 2009).* Limewire software connection to the Internet showed no reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]