Search for: "Does 1 - 35" Results 61 - 80 of 9,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2021, 5:08 am by Texas Legal News
Between 1 and 2 victims are involved in collisions with trucks. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:35 am by Docket Navigator
[M]erely being cumulative of other prior art does not invoke § 315(e)(2) estoppel. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:49 am by Docket Navigator
The Board granted institution of covered business method review of a patent directed to electronic trading under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:30 am by Joseph Robinson & Robert Schaffer
§ 324(e) Does Not Bar Judicial Review of Initial USPTO Determination That Patent is for a “Covered Business Method” (Versata I); and (4) 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Does the 12 month Window of 35 U.S.C. 315(b) Ever Reset? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm by Mark Terry
Today's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) decision in Ex parte Harrison read like a veritable anatomy of a 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a site for referral and contemplation, I wanted to include the text of the newly drafted statute 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:23 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Ejectment Actions Ejectment is a legal action brought by a plaintiff under N.J.S.A. 2A:35-1 and R. 4:59-2, claiming a right to possess real property against a defendant who currently possesses the property. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:45 am by Docket Navigator
Wangs Alliance Corporation d/b/a WAC Lighting Co., 1-14-cv-12298 (MAD January 2, 2018, Order) (Casper, USDJ) [read post]