Search for: "Does 1 - 35" Results 81 - 100 of 9,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 10:48 am by Scott Brinkman
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Note that 54(1) and 54(2) are parallel to 35 U.S.C. 102(a) while 54(3) is parallel to 102(a)(2) which the IPO does not propose to change. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 6:02 pm
(3) Does the magazine's copyright necessarily protect the pattern or resulting toy? [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
—Chapter 11 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end of Section 112(f) the following: An element expressed as a function that does not comply with this subsection shall be in considered to be in violation of subsection (b). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:54 am
  According to Proveris, section 271(e)(1) does not immunize infringement of patents on laboratory or manufacturing equipment. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Gene Quinn
Of course, 102(b)(2)(C) does not eliminate prior art that qualifies under 102(a)(1), but 102(a)(2) makes the patent application prior... [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
Jude Medical, Inc. to decide the question: Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
No invention:Turning to the second step [of Alice], we find claim 1 does not contain an inventive concept sufficient to “‘transform the nature of the claim’ into a patent-eligible application. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:58 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
  If the initial set of interrogatories does not exhaust this limit, the balance may be propounded in subsequent sets. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
But does the standard of patent validity actually matter? [read post]