Search for: "Does 1 - 35"
Results 121 - 140
of 9,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
Does a district court have discretion under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:58 pm
As you have no doubt heard, on January 1, 2013, Congress passed a compromise bill to avoid the 'fiscal cliff.' [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 9:03 pm
Does this set some sort of record? [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:09 pm
The vote was 35-15. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:44 am
LEXIS 35 (1st Dist. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 7:02 am
“[M]ere inclusion in Title 35 of the United States Code does not make a statute a patent law under which a claim may arise. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:25 am
" The combination of SMART and SERIES "does not result in a mark which as a whole has a nondescriptive or incongruous meaning. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
What does this all mean to you? [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:57 pm
An RPI that is barred under § 315(b) would bar a petitioner from institution. (35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:39 pm
If Congress does nothing, on January 1, 2013, the estate tax exemption will be reduced to $1,000,000.00 and the estate tax rate will increase to 55%. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
§2.52(b)(1). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:53 am
As of January 1, 2023, Tennessee will require all private employers with at least 35 employees to use E-Verify and maintain E-Verify case results. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc.; Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC, 1-15-cv-00131 (HID September 29, 2015, Order) (Kay, M.J.) [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, 1-14-cv-01192 (DED February 5, 2016, Order) (Burke, M.J.) [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:01 am
In a 2-1 decision, the court of appeals held in Grant that current Rule 35(b) requires only that cooperation be the condition precedent to any reduction; it no longer requires, as did a previous iteration of the Rule, that any reduction "reflect" that cooperation. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
But again, this does not have to happen to you at all!! [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:04 pm
Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
(Source: Amgen's press release) Hoffman-LaRoche based its motion to dismiss on the assertion that all of the allegedly infringing activities fell under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(1), which exempts activities reasonably related to the development of information necessary for FDA approval. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:04 am
Narrative Science Inc., 1-15-cv-05129 (ILND January 3, 2017, Order) (Tharp, Jr., USDJ) [read post]
