Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2008, 3:16 am
LEXIS 38 (February 27, 2008) certiorari denied, No. 31,005, April 23, 2008.* A driver's compliance with the Minnesota implied-consent law does not create a waiver of the driver's statutory physician-patient privilege regarding an alcohol-concentration test result taken solely for medical-treatment purposes. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:01 am
Apparently Dick Bennett of ARG does not buy into the record Independent turnout the DMR Gold Standard Poll does. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
However, as pointed out in CP16/38, it does need to amend DTR 2.5 in order to comply with the ESMA guidelines on the delay in the disclosure of inside information. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:40 pm
The $90.00 personal allowance reduction is not countable as income towards Medicaid, M21-1MR, Part V, Subpart iii, Chapter 3 1. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:10 pm
See 1/2 Price Checks Cashed v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 8:13 pm
Here is a link to a thoughtful article in the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology by Hofstra Professor Katrina Fischer Kuh entitled Electronically Manufactured Law - Why the shift to electronic research merits attention. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 8:17 am
Instead of dwelling on ROI, perhaps it’s enough to ask does the person and function “make life a little easier for practicing lawyers? [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 9:05 am
S. at 38. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm
App. 1 Cir. 10/28/09), 29 So. 3d 621, 621 (La. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 2:27 pm
Why, then, does that good thinking not reach all the way down? [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm
On this topic, the Court concluded “that section 38-33.3-217(1)(a)(I) merely governs requirements for unit owners’ voting percentages and does not prohibit a declaration from imposing an additional requirement of declarant consent for amendments. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm
On this topic, the Court concluded “that section 38-33.3-217(1)(a)(I) merely governs requirements for unit owners’ voting percentages and does not prohibit a declaration from imposing an additional requirement of declarant consent for amendments. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
Unlike the limitations and exceptions provisions, this is not a limitation or exception as it does not envision the possibility of permitting a user to circumvent a digital lock. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & Pagos, 868 N.E.2d 4 (Ind. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
” That said, he does acknowledge the downturn is a factor. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:12 pm
Does this avoid self-dealing? [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
Triumph Learning LLC, Opposition No. 91170112 (September 17, 2010) [precedential].Standing re 2(e)(1): Applicant Triumph argued that Opposer does not have standing to bring a mere descriptiveness claim because Opposer did not assert the "right or a potential need to use the word 'Coach' descriptively. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 11:04 am
S.41(3) reads (3) At the end of the period of three years beginning with the coming into force of a provision of sections 33 to 38 or section 40, that provision also applies to any assured shorthold tenancy of a dwelling-house in England— (a) which is in existence at that time, and (b) to which that provision does not otherwise apply by virtue of subsection (1) or (2). [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
C.38 (the “Act”) require an organization to disclose the email addresses and phone numbers of its members? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:00 pm
C.38 (the “Act”) require an organization to disclose the email addresses and phone numbers of its members? [read post]
