Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2023, 5:33 pm
To date, it does not appear that Massachusetts' courts have wrestled with these interpretive questions. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:10 am
The latest issue of the Review of International Studies (Vol. 41, no. 1, January 2015) is out. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:19 pm
The latest issue of Air & Space Law (Vol. 41, nos. 4-5, 2016) is out. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:56 am
The fines and costs for drinking and driving offenses in the 42-1 Court in Romeo tend to be on the high side but are consistent with fines and costs imposed in other courts such as the 41-B District Court, Clinton Township, which is also located in Macomb County. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
Tim Balducci got mad and authored the now infamous "man crush" letter -- to me, a pretty good indication that whenever it was that Balducci was "flipped," it wasn't before this letter was written on August 1, 2007. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 7:06 am
The final rule revises the OFCCP’s regulations at 41 CFR Parts 60-1, 60-2, 60-4, and 60-50. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:54 am
Do (pronounced "truck doe") as a justice on 4/1! [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
Taxpayers also should be advised to contact the pass-through entity if and when an expected Schedule K-1 does not appear. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:36 am
An anonymous 911 call of a domestic disturbance does not per se permit an entry, but here it did. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:26 pm
Manny Segarra - 41%Group 19:Yvonne Colodny - 32% vs. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
Sec. 28-1-105). [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:26 am
I love getting these email updates as of late from Linda's brother-in-law: Sent: Sat, January 23, 2010 9:46:41 AM Subject: Linda Rivera Continued Improvement 1-23-2010 @ 9:45am PST Linda continues to improve, slowly, but surely. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:02 am
Armendariz-Nunez, 2012 NMCA 41, 2012 N.M. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
On Appeal: A divided Court voted 2-1 to affirm the trial court. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Applicant Kendrick then successfully moved to amend her application filing basis to Section 1(b) intent-to-use. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
Does "loophole closing" count as a tax hike? [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States, 24 F.2d 665, 666-67 (9th Cir.1928) (holding that Rule 41(d), now Rule 41(f)(1)(C), does not invariably require that the copy of the warrant and receipt be served before a search takes place). [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Highway Equip., 469 F.3d at 1033 n.1 (observing that, in situations where a patentee unilaterally secures a Super Sack dismissal, the patentee's "covenant does not deprive the district court of jurisdiction to determine the disposition of the patent infringement claims raised in the Complaint under Rule 41"); Cooper Notification, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
Here is a select sample for your perusal:1. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
