Search for: "Does 1 - 44" Results 141 - 160 of 4,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2008, 12:47 am
According to authorities, it is likely that a Brazilian-born woman suspected of returning to her homeland after being accused of killing her husband in their northeast Ohio home will not be returned to the United States for trial.[1]Prosecutors allege that Claudia Hoerig, 42, fatally shot her husband, Karl Hoerig, 44, at their Newton Falls home, approximately 40 miles southeast of Cleveland, on March 12 and fled to Brazil immediately thereafter.[2]A federal warrant obtained by The… [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Thirty-four states have major tax changes taking effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 10:45 am by Marco Rossi
The provision of article 44, paragraph 1, g) sexies is designed to operate as an anti-abuse rule aimed at allowing the assessment of an Italian final income tax upon beneficiaries who receive trust income that has not been subject to a sufficient level of taxation in the foreign jurisdiction of the trust. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
, The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1-44 (1960). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:08 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers and employees should review and consider adjusting their travel allowance policies beginning October 1 in response to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Notice 2022-44. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:28 am
 Spa Monopole (the opponent) filed an opposition in May 2015 pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), on the basis of its two earlier registered national trade marks:“SPA” for goods in Class 32 (Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, syrups and other preparations for making beverages), and“LES THERMES DE SPA” for services in Class 44 (Services rendered by a thermal establishment… [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
" Despite the fact that Opposer, a Cuban entity, "does not and cannot engage in any business in the United States due to the embargo on Cuban goods," the Board concluded that Opposer has a "real interest" in the outcome of this proceeding, and thus has standing.Turning to the merits of the 2(e)(3) claim, the pertinent elements were set out in In re California Innovations Inc., 66 USPQ2d 1853, 1856-57 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 11:01 pm by Pietro Franzina
Ingrid Wiertz, Case C-4/14), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) clarified the interpretation of Article 1(2) and Article 49 of Regulation No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matter (Brussels I), corresponding to Articles 1(2) and 55 of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels Ia), as well as the interpretation of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 2201/2003 on jurisdiction and the… [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 9:20 am by Veronika Gaertner
(a) Is the second indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ('Regulation No 44/2001?) [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:52 am by Matthias Weller
The principle of customary international law concerning the jurisdictional immunity of States does not preclude the application of Regulation No 44/2001 in proceedings relating to such an action. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:15 am
If you or a loved one has been injured in a motor vehicle accident of any kind, call us at 1 (800) 228-9159 to learn and protect your rights. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
HR Services, 2022 ONSC 2645 [44] The Plaintiff’s breach of the deemed undertaking rule does not, in my view, automatically attract an award of elevated costs. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:30 pm by CMS
On 13 October 2021, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy) [2021] UKSC 44. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by Michael Thomas
The Alberta Court of Appeal held that the Insurance Act does not contain any direct freestanding limitation period. [read post]