Search for: "Does 1 - 47" Results 21 - 40 of 4,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
"If you say yes, then 1 of 11 posts today is about my 'personal life.' [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 1:17 pm by Maxwell Radway
Table of Changes Subject Matter Current Entitlement under the Employment Standards Act New Entitlement (Bill 47, once enacted) Minimum Wage $14 minimum wage $15 minimum wage on January 1, 2019 Minimum wage frozen at $14 until October 1, 2020 Minimum wage will be subject to an annual inflation adjustment starting October 1, 2020 Scheduling Starting January 1, 2019, employees can request changes in work schedule or location. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:00 pm
It will repeat at 1:47 am (EDT) Wednesday morning. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
2) Does anyone think that it is wrong? [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:06 pm by Orin Kerr
Another section is similar, but lacks in the intent requirement: It prohibits “permit[ing] any telephone facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited” elsewhere in the statute. 47 U.S.C. 223(b)(1)(B).I’m not sure how advocates of the activity/inactivity distinction will view this statute, but just from a common-sense perspective it looks to me like it regulates inactivity. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
The latest issue of the Texas International Law Journal (Vol. 47, no. 1, Fall 2011) is out. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:13 am by John Diekman
Practice point: A party must pay his or her own attorney's fee unless an award is authorized by an agreement between the parties, by statute, or by court rule.Student note: The plaintiff cannot recover an award of an attorney's fee under the New York Civil Rights Law, which does not provide for such relief, pursuant to § 47-b[1]).Case: Degregorio v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
As a result, Bill 47 repeals section 1 (1) and the definition of “difference in employment status” in subsection 1 (1) of the Employment Standards Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
No less than 47 amicus curiae briefs were filed with the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case G 1/21, where the crucial referral question will be answered: “Is the conduct of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference compatible with the right to oral proceedings as enshrined in Article 116(1) EPC if not all of the parties to the proceedings have given their consent to the conduct of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference? [read post]
24 May 2021, 7:57 am by Evan Brown
Defendants moved for a judgment on the pleadings (a form of a motion to dismiss), arguing that 47 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:48 pm
The AML/CTF Rules to be made under section 47(1) of the AML/CTF Act will specify the reporting period(s) and the lodgement period within which compliance reports are required to be submitted to AUSTRAC. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Practice Tip #1: While on the surface this appears to be a copyright case, an allegation of interception under 47 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:28 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Amendments found in Bill 47 does not change the provisions of the LRA providing for card-based certification in the construction industry. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 7:30 am by FM Librarian
," Rights in Exile News, no. 98 (Jan. 2019) [full-text]Related posts:- Regional Focus: Europe - Pt. 1 (19 Dec. 2018)- Regional Focus: Europe - Pt. 2 (19 Dec. 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]