Search for: "Does 1 though 50" Results 21 - 40 of 4,819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
 Either the Act reserves power to the Crown to do that, including by giving notice under Article 50, or it does not. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 7:37 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
In so ruling, the court noted: a. the government would be unduly prejudiced without a forced sale, since a partial sale is not viable; b. the prejudice to Derek is minimal since he does not live on the premises and will receive 50% of the sale proceeds - further Derek could bid on the sale to either buy the full property himself or attempt to bid up the ultimate purchase price; and c. as a 50/50 ownership split, the relative ownership considerations weighed in… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 2:26 pm by Stephen Gardner
Page 27: In sum, plaintiffs’ allegations sufficiently state a claim that defendants have violated FDA regulations by making health claims about vitaminwater even though it does not meet required minimum nutritional thresholds, by using the word “healthy” in implied nutrient content claims even though vitaminwater’s fortification does not comply with FDA policy, and by using a product name that references only two of vitaminwater’s… [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
Even though the seat belt usage rate in the U.S. is on the rise, officials believe that 1 out of every 7 travelers does not buckle up during every car ride. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:43 am by Mack Sperling
But what if a 50% owner goes ahead and retains counsel to represent the LLC against her 50% co-owner, who does not consent to the representation? [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
"  It does not address the extraordinary transformation of an LLC as a nominal defendant in a declaratory judgment action into an active litigant against one of its members. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:15 pm
There is no point insisting on or against a 50 /50 split for the sake of it. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:15 am by Clay
This subsection does not apply to the use of a voice-operated or hands-free device if the driver of the motor vehicle does not use his or her hands to operate the device, except to activate or deactivate a feature or function of the device.Section 2. 346.95 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:346.95 (1) Any person violating s. 346.87, 346.88, 346.89 (4), (4m), or (5), 346.90 to 346.92, or 346.94 (1), (9), (10), (11), (12), or (15) may be required to… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
  So what does we do with him? [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
He now must pay Alejandra $11,511 per month in support, retroactive to July 1. [read post]