Search for: "Does 1 through 14, inclusive"
Results 61 - 80
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 3:17 am
Greg Lambert 1:22 I’ll stop looking at the stats. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:07 am
A business that collects personal information through a mobile application may also provide a link to the notice within the application, such as through the application’s settings menu. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, holding 8-1 that the SEC can seek disgorgement of profits as a remedy in court for violating the securities fraud laws if the amount does not exceed the wrongdoer’s net profit and is awarded for the victims. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
TW, SW, and EM, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough Of Hillingdon (2018) EWHC 1791 This was a judicial review of Hillingdon’s allocation scheme and in particular, the thresholds for eligibility for inclusion on the housing list set by Hillingdon. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
It’s a summary of all appeals and leaves to appeal granted, so you know what the S.C.C. will soon be dealing with (June 17 to July 19, 2017 inclusive). [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:41 pm
Second, the Court of Appeals in Crump compared the felony disqualification in G.S. 14-51.4(1) to the wording of G.S. 14-51.2(c)(3). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Board appointments are not made through a public or even systematized process; one does not apply to be a board member. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:08 pm
Debate is expected to continue through Thursday, January 29, with final Senate passage expected that day. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[14] Amy J. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
In summary, the referral to the EBA was from the Technical Board of Appeal (TBA) in case T 0489/14. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The first is that “the person meets all of the criteria set out in subsection (1)”. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
He does so not through a single thread of argument or theory but by offering snippets from the views of various philosophers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:19 am
Better concentration does not equal great enjoyment or absorption? [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 2:25 pm
Although this amendment is not new, the author has three novel ideas which is noteworthy.1. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:28 am
’s suspension of entry does not apply to the following: a.) [read post]
25 May 2014, 1:39 am
There is then a limited re-inclusion provision (s.21(4)). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Inclusion of a dual-criminality clause rather than a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both parties. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
This very long – 123 pages – decision contains lots of interesting procedural aspects (it’s one of those decisions where the appellants are desperate enough to invoke Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention, which is never a good sign) and is well worth skimming through. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 10:08 am
Broome’s life demonstrates that the Indian national community can be broad enough, and inclusive enough, to transcend even the divide that the Empire attempted to construct between coloniser and colonised; his own life, and the intellectual climate that accommodated him, demonstrates the possibility of an ‘alternative modernity’, a spirit of tolerance and respect drawing upon both ‘western modern and indigenous traditional cultural systems’.[15]This… [read post]
