Search for: "Does 1 to 20" Results 81 - 100 of 28,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Therefore, any F-1, J-1, or M-1 nonimmigrant who is under 18 years of age does not accrue unlawful presence, even if they failed to maintain their nonimmigrant status. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:53 pm by Uthman Law Office
The Court of Appeal held that  the RJA does not violate article VI, section 13 of the California Constitution. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Woodrow Pollack
  Failing to find the language in the Administrative Order which Plaintiff relies on, the Court instead turned to Executive Order 20-91, entered by Florida's Governor on April 1, 2010. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:30 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00838-JMS-DML File Date:    Monday, June 18, 2012 Plaintiff:     Millennium TGA Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 10:12 pm by Jon Ibanez
One wonders, “What does Santa bring a child who just saved, literally, a bus-load of other children, himself, and a soon-to-be-on-the-Naughty-List bus driver? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:21 pm by Jordan D. Maglich
  Assuming that Picard does not succeed with his planned appeal, the dismissal of common-law claims leaves the only remaining avenue of recovery against JP Morgan and UBS in federal bankruptcy claims, of which $425 million is sought from JP Morgan and $1 billion from UBS. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has a proposal that does not provide full protections for the Internet and could vote to enact the plan early as December. [read post]
31 May 2018, 3:45 pm
 1)University Of Chicago2)Virginia3)Duke 4)Harvhard5) Stanford  round out the top five. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:07 am
Doe II, No. 36121 (Idaho June 1, 2010) (opinion via Leagle, Inc.): Although the Does’ daughter is on probation, it does not necessarily follow that they themselves are subject to a diminished expectation of privacy in their bodily fluids. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
  Although Dreier's attorney had argued for a sentence of 12 and 1/2 years' imprisonment, the 20-year term that Judge Rakoff imposed was far less than the 145 year term that the government had sought in its filings (available here). [read post]
22 May 2022, 1:13 pm by Jon Sands
In sentencing issues of first impression concerning receiving and distributing child porn, the 9th holds (1) 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) does not require the defendant to actually receive “valuable consideration” for a sentencing enhancement; and (2) 3014(a)requires a $5000 fine per offense rather than the nature of offense.Dissenting, Wardlaw argues that 3014(a) differs markedly from 3013, which requires an assessment per conviction, and must be interpreted differently.There are… [read post]