Search for: "Does 1-104"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2013, 3:55 am
Co. of America, 104 Wash. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:43 pm
The part of bill that has caused the biggest uproar can be found in Section 104 on Preemption. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 2:46 am
A non qualified assignment or non qualified structured settlement offers a solution to a wide variety of disputes or claims for damages that do not fall within the realm of damages under IRC 104(a)(1) or 104(a)(2). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: does it, further, make any difference whether the sign contested by the holder of a trade mark is devoid of distinctive character, within the terms of Article 3(1)(b) of Directive 89/104, or contains a designation, within the terms of Article 3(1)(c) of the Directive? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:16 am
Section 104(a) provides, in pertinent part, that gross income does not include the amount of any damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:17 pm
Quebec, 104 The Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 4:24 pm
Hazelwood, 104 Misc. 2d 1121, 1123-1124 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
§ 29-20-104(b) (1980). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
For now, a Bitcoin wallet appears to be a method of transmitting Bitcoin and not a deposit account against which a lien can be perfected by control pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code Section 9-104.Perhaps more importantly, Bitcoin is not a form of money under Uniform Commercial Code Section 1-201(24) because it has not been "authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
For now, a Bitcoin wallet appears to be a method of transmitting Bitcoin and not a deposit account against which a lien can be perfected by control pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code Section 9-104.Perhaps more importantly, Bitcoin is not a form of money under Uniform Commercial Code Section 1-201(24) because it has not been "authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:31 am
1. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396, 104 L. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:13 pm
So, providing that the government does not shut down on October 1 (see our article here), this month will be a busy one for the FM band – for both translator and LPFM applicants. [read post]
23 May 2010, 10:50 pm
The text of the ordinance (as provided on the County web site - I make no representations regarding its correctness) is as follows:SECTION 1. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
This leads to a lack of clarity in the meaning of A 84 EPC 1973 since it is not determinable in which configuration the respective joining surfaces are related to one another in the piston assembly according to claim 1. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm
In particular, Ouest SCS failed to bring any evidence that the distribution of Chanel samples in authorised point of sales does amount to trade mark exhaustion. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:07 am
Registration of the earlier trade mark in the Member State concerned does not constitute a prerequisite for the running of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence prescribed in Article 9(1) of Directive 89/104. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:09 pm
According to the Summary of Claims in the Appeal Brief, steps B and C correspond to states 208 and 210 in the flowchart, and these steps are performed by the system builder (104 in FIG. 2). [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:29 am
However, 1. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
The section 104(a)(2) exclusion may apply to damages recovered for a personal physical injury or physical sickness under a statute, even if that statute does not provide for a broad range of remedies. [read post]
