Search for: "Does 1-104"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 8:12 pm
IRC 104(a)(1) deals with workers compensation payments and 104(a)(2) deals with damages for physical injury and physical sickness. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
No. 101-650, 104 Stat. 5089 (1990), Congress extended the deadline for North Carolina and Alabama to implement the program to October 1, 2002, without any corresponding explanation for the special treatment. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:01 am
Does this make sense? [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
According to this Board, the interpretation of those decisions ignores the fact that Article 114(2) EPC does not justify such discretion, as previous case law has repeatedly stated. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:44 am
A:9-33 et seq. and a Public Health Emergency as contemplated by N.J.S.A. 26:13-1 et seq. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm
” The City responds that the provision does not violate the access to courts provision because it does not abolish, but merely alters a preexisting right, satisfying Kruger. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:28 am
As the court explained, “the misconduct charged also constituted the crime of official misconduct under Section 195.00[1] of the Penal Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689, 104 S. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:56 am
--A plan must be amended to reflect the requirements of section 401(a)(37) and (if used by the employer) section 414(u)(9) by the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2010 (January 1, 2012, for governmental plans). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:56 pm
Adjusted amounts effective 4-1-07 are in brackets.] [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 1:01 am
The MAC is generated by the central server 104 by encrypting with a secret key the vehicle and test data and a unique serial number read from the barcode of the blank MOT certificate. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:51 am
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board ruled that the payment mandated by Section 4600(e)(1) was not a payment of temporary disability within the meaning of Section 4656(c)(1) and did not begin the 104-week limitation period. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am
The subsequent Auxiliary request 2 and Auxiliary request 3 both contained an additional independent claim (i.e., claim 2).Claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request 2 were based on combinations of claims 1 and 2 and claims 1 and 9 as granted respectively. [read post]
15 May 2018, 2:41 am
Cir. 2012):1. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:42 am
As the Act itself states, in Section 306(a.2)(1), the IRE is used “to determine the degree of impairment due to the compensable injury, if any. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:24 am
While visitors who suffer injury while present on the property of another person often have a reasonable chance of success in a legal action against the landowner for negligence or other misconduct, Tennessee law does construct some hard-and-fast protections for landlowners. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:24 am
While visitors who suffer injury while present on the property of another person often have a reasonable chance of success in a legal action against the landowner for negligence or other misconduct, Tennessee law does construct some hard-and-fast protections for landlowners. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:36 pm
While visitors who suffer injury while present on the property of another person often have a reasonable chance of success in a legal action against the landowner for negligence or other misconduct, Tennessee law does construct some hard-and-fast protections for landlowners. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:18 pm
Here is my paper:AMENDMENTS TO THE MARRIAGE ACT 1961QUEENSLAND LAW SOCIETY LIVECAST Q &A14 FEBRUARY 2018Stephen Page[1]1. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:58 pm
Hazelwood, 104 Misc.2d 1121, 1123 (N.Y. [read post]
