Search for: "Does 1-133" Results 21 - 40 of 1,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
§ 227(b)(1)(A)(iii), alleging that the defendant instructed or allowed a third party to send unsolicited text messages to him and others. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:42 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Article L. 133-1 of the French IPC provides that if “a work is subject to a publishing contract for its publication and distribution in a book form, the author may not object to the lending of copies of this publication by a library open to the public. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
But their view does not appear to be controlling precedent. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is a revocation appeal in a case where there were no less than four opponents.Claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request 2 read:1. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Admissibility of the amendments under A 123(3)[5] For the [opponent], modifying claim 1 such that it is now directed to “a railway vehicle” while claim 1 as granted is directed to “a braking control system” amounted to an extension of the protection conferred which contravened A 123(3). [5.1] The Board does not agree. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm by Sean Hanover
Does your client have a right to view the evidence against him/her? [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
  The frequency of such claims beg the questions (1) what exactly is a “confidential relationship,” and (2) what is the practical benefit to an objectant in establishing that one existed? [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Altoona Fam Inc., 133 USPQ 410, 410-11 (TTAB 1962) (citation omitted); see also Am. [read post]