Search for: "Does 1-141"
Results 1 - 20
of 987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 9:06 am
The IPKat wondered a few weeks ago what the point was of the new requirements as from 1 January 2011 to supply search results to the EPO on priority applications, under an amended version of Rule 141 EPC. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:56 am
§ 141(c). . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:27 am
As from 1 January 2011 Rule 141 EPC, as modified by Administrative Council decision CA/D 18/09, will require applicants to supply search results relating to any priority filings. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 6:01 am
Below I suggest that, as currently applied, §141(e) does not sufficiently protect conscientious directors, examine why that may be so, highlight the need for alternative approaches to provide truly full protection without undermining other important conduct imperatives Delaware law imposes on directors and others, and offer some suggestions toward that end. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:48 am
The Court stated that Domestic Relations Law § 141 simply provided an:additional procedural and substantive detail with respect to an action to annul a marriage based upon five years' incurable mental illness of one of the parties, to ensure that the disabled spouse is cared for and does not become a public charge. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 4:08 pm
Section 141(b) does not contemplate that a director’s term could end through board shrinkage. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:33 am
As if things weren't complicated enough already, what with all the rule changes this year and the looming 1 October deadline for divisional applications, the EPO will be making things a little bit more difficult for applicants as from 1 January 2011. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm
The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Alabama (7), Arkansas (3), California (2), Georgia (1), Illinois (17), Indiana (13), Iowa (7), Kentucky (50), Michigan (6), Minnesota (3), Missouri (9), Mississippi (2), New Jersey (1), North Carolina (3), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (2), South Carolina (3), Tennessee (6), Texas (1), and Wisconsin (2). [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
Baker & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government& Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 141. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:39 pm
§ 1295(a)(1). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:21 am
While we thus construe § 3(n)(1) asapplying the new AIA provisions only to new applications,it does not follow that § 3(n)(1) requires application of pre-AIA judicial review provisions to old applications.(...)For interferences declared after September 15, 2012, thisprovision explicitly authorizes pre-AIA § 141 review, butunlike AIA § 6(f)(c)(3), does not authorize pre-AIA § 146review. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Normal 0 0 1 2970 16934 The University of Chicago 141 33 20796 11.1282 0 0 0 I. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 7:28 pm
Does one of their own family members need to be affected or die from something that is preventable? [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm
§ 2911.01(A)(1) “does not have a culpability requirement. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:50 am
Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141, 146 (1989). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am
For many in the cannabis industry, April 1, 2022 is seen as a day of reckoning following the July 2021 passage of Assembly Bill 141 and Senate Bill 160 (collectively, the Cannabis Trailer Bill). [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm
., 141 S. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 3:14 pm
Does the fraction need to be formatted as 1/2 or ½? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:54 pm
§ 314(d) does not bar this court’s immediate review of the Director’s decision.St. [read post]
