Search for: "Does 1-141" Results 1 - 20 of 988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
If adopted by the General Assembly and signed into law by the governor, the amendments would become effective August 1, 2024, except to the extent described below. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Anna Tkachova
Widening the Sanctions Coalition Widening the sanctions coalition through greater multilateral cooperation may prove to be another fruitful approach: 141 states voted for the U.N. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 1220 (2021); see, Bernard Bell, A Little Blue Birdie Told Me: Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Thus, a restrictive covenant is reasonable only if it: “(1) is no greater than is required for the protection of a legitimate business interest of the employer-promisee; (2) does not impose undue hardship on the employee-promisor, and (3) is not injurious to the public. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
What does it mean for an organization to be operated for the promotion of social welfare? [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Under Section 141(c)(2), a committee does not have any power with respect to approving an agreement of merger or its terms. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a “new wave” stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the “Company”) and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) because it contained “pre-approval rights” over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a “new wave” stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the “Company”) and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) because it contained “pre-approval rights” over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a… [read post]