Search for: "Does 1-152"
Results 1 - 20
of 863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
Wyeth, No. 09-152. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:56 am
Wyeth, No. 09-152. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
If related by blood: aunt, uncle, nephew, niece (Sec. 152(a)(1-8)). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:26 am
Commissioner, 152 T.C. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
DOES 1-152 WD Wash 2013http://t.co/PKj30HJC9y -> NSA spying broke rules thousands of times, report says http://t.co/5SFeqEl8eK -> Washington Post, CNN, Time hacked by alleged Pro-Assad group http://t.co/Op1xWxSEjD -> California 'revenge porn' bill passes Senate http://t.co/ajBHkVeuxB -> YouTube Windows Phone app blocked by Google http://t.co/ngfghbaBaX -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-08-15: Stock fraud scams tough to combat in internet age… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
AB 152 does not provide any additional or new leave to current employees. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:40 pm
Smith, 375 N.C. 152, 2020-NCSC-45, ¶ 16.State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
Nor does it answer other questions that arise. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
However, it disallowed the taxpayer’s claim for the two dependency exemption deductions.The Tax Court began its analysis by pointing out that under section 152(e)(1), the child who is in the custody of one or both of the child’s parents for more than one-half of the calendar year and receives more than one-half of his or her support from parents who are divorced is treated as the qualifying child of the custodial parent. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
That’s found in section 152(a) before the amendment, and in section 152(d)(1)(C) of the current statute. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:45 am
That’s found in section 152(a) before the amendment, and in section 152(d)(1)(C) of the current statute. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:01 am
Under section 152(c)(1), a person is a qualifying child if, among other things, the person meets the age requirement of section 152(c)(3). [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 5:54 am
But what if the parents share custody 50/50 and the divorce decree or separation agreement hasn’t been entered into or does not address the issue? [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Leaving aside the question of whether this communication is still applicable in view of Article 7(1), second sentence, of the Revision Act of 29 November 2000 and the decisions of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 (OJ EPO 2007, Special edition No. 1, 197) and 7 December 2006 (OJ EPO 2007, Special edition No. 1, 89), it certainly does not impose stricter requirements on professional representatives regarding the communication of their appointment in… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:25 pm
Koch Power, Inc., 186 S.W.3d 145, 152 (Tex. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:55 am
She does not get her down payment back. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:17 am
(The court noted that the reviewing board clarified the purpose of the cross-reference to c. 152, which addresses expanded penalties for misclassifying workers but does not address whether an individual is an employee for purposes of workers’ comp benefits). [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 3:04 pm
Cameron LNG is now authorized to export a total of 772 Bcf (14.95 million metric tons)/year of LNG to non-FTA nations from Liquefaction Trains 1, 2, and 3 at its Cameron Terminal. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 7:03 pm
Yet the report does conclude that there are some aspects of the American system that have created the disadvantage. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:46 am
§ 152(1) are1. the bankruptcy proceeding was in existence2. the defendant fraudulent concealed the property from the custodian (such as the bankruptcy trustee)3. the property belong to the estateThe manual makes reference to the cases of United States v. [read post]
