Search for: "Does 1-188"
Results 21 - 40
of 691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Does it matter? [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
Finally, the guardian can compel an accounting from the former holder of a POA under MHL § 81.43 (see Matter Kent, 188 Misc 2d 509 [Sup Ct, Dutchess County 2001]).[1] Relief Available under the General Obligations Law. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
I, § 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
Barnes, 345 N.C. 146, 149, 478 S.E.2d 188, 190 (1996). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Russell, 215 A.D.3d 1213, 188 N.Y.S.3d 759 (3d Dept. 2023) [see § 124. 08[1] n. 1.4], an incomplete response to the form’s “Question 13” resulted in denial of the employer’s application for Board Review. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Litig., 188 F.R.D. 237, 240 (E.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:06 am
NETCLASS filed a new Form F-1 on the same day that it withdrew a prior registration statement. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
App. 101, 114, 784 S.E.2d 188, 197, rev’d in part on other grounds, 369 N.C. 298, 794 S.E.2d 306 (2016). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“Does not the cause of working women need serious attention? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
Watson, 188 F. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am
He had been given s.188 Housing Act 1996 accommodation in hostel supported accommodation (a ‘halfway house’).. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:35 pm
§§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Section 241 does not fit that description. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ADJ14258730—WCAB Panel: Commissioners Capurro, Snellings, Chair Zalewski Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board Panel Decision) Opinion Filed October 13, 2023 Injury AOE/COE—Substantial Medical Evidence—COVID-19—WCAB, granting reconsideration, rescinded decision in which WCJ found that decedent sustained injury in form of COVID-19 while employed by defendant as buyer on 12/4/2020, resulting in his death on 1/8/2021, and returned matter to WCJ for… [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
Trials A – D are technical trials about the validity and/or essentiality of certain patents (the Judge in Trial E observed that the sample in these technical trials was too small to allow him to draw any conclusion as to the quality of Optis’ Portfolio; also, that the decisions of very experienced first instance judges varied on appeal, showing that the outcomes of questions of essentiality and validity are nuanced and extremely difficult to predict: [188]). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
The result in the appellate court was a split, 2-1 decision that automatically brought the case to the state’s highest court. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
On further appeal, the High Court held that ACL s 23 does apply to Mr Ho’s contract, with the result that the class action waiver clause was void: Karpik v Carnival plc [2023] HCA 39. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Does it encompass arbitration proceedings? [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
I recently had the privilege of speaking to an audience of judges of the New York Supreme Court Commercial Division at Fordham Law School’s Eileen Bransten Institute on Complex Commercial Litigation. [read post]
