Search for: "Does 1-205" Results 1 - 20 of 1,000
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Yet, 226 House members voted by proxy while the remaining 205 House members were present and voted in-person. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The next phase of this litigation may provide an interesting analysis of the remedial power of DGCL Sections 204 and 205. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
As regards the first question, the Supreme Court considered the following: 1. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the application of the savings provision of CPLR 205(a), raised for the first time on appeal, “does not involve a pure question of law that appears on the face of the record and could not have been avoided if brought to the Supreme Court’s attention” (U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  Under that standard, the First Amendment does not preclude punishment for incitement if it is established that the speech in question was “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and was “likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Of the 207 food-derived isolates recovered in the study, 205 were biotype 1A. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
ADJ14258730—WCAB Panel: Commissioners Capurro, Snellings, Chair Zalewski Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board Panel Decision) Opinion Filed October 13, 2023 Injury AOE/COE—Substantial Medical Evidence—COVID-19—WCAB, granting reconsideration, rescinded decision in which WCJ found that decedent sustained injury in form of COVID-19 while employed by defendant as buyer on 12/4/2020, resulting in his death on 1/8/2021, and returned matter to WCJ for… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am by George Croner
The report recommended that, as a policy initiative, Congress require that the government secure a court order before examining the contents of any communication retrieved from the Section 702 database using U.S. person identifiers as querying terms (pp. 205-208). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 1:44 pm by Russell Knight
Booker, 2022 IL App (1st) 211055 It also does not matter if there has been a lull in alleged abuse. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 11:59 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
(iii) This subsection does not apply to tinting materials that: Are affixed in such a manner so as to be easily removed; and Are being used to protect a child less than 10 years of age from the sun. [read post]