Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 81 - 100 of 12,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am by Jeremy
(2) (a) If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, does the fact that there has been an alteration as referred to in Question 1 have any bearing on the answer to the question whether exhaustion within the terms of Article 4(2) of [Directive 2001/29] is hindered or interrupted? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a matter of fact, the usual practice is that particular embodiments of a claimed invention are only disclosed in detail in the description and drawings.[2.3] Hence, the main request cannot be allowed as it does not comply with A 53(c).The applicant then introduced a disclaimer the wording of which was inspired by G 1/07. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
Today the CJEU ruled as follows, the bits that refer to national Belgian law being emphsized in bold.:1. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:49 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Attorneys who prosecute and defend bodily injury actions in New York are well aware of Workers’ Compensation Law §29(1) and the ever-present impact of the liens that it creates on any potential settlement or recovery for plaintiffs who are injured while in the course of their employment. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:54 pm by Sme
School District No. 1 (10th Cir., March 28, 2018) (affirming dismissal of Johnson's complaint based on Colorado Supreme Court decision regarding state property interest in salary and benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm by Lawrence Solum
Leonid Sirota (New York University (NYU) - JSD Program) has posted Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions (Oxford University Journal of Commonwealth Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 29, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
18 May 2007, 8:33 am
Defendant sought to dismiss her criminal case for abusing a vulnerable adult on speedy trial grounds, see 29-1207 and Constitutional provisions, US Constitution Amendment 6, Nebraska Constitution Article 1 Section 11. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:05 am by Santosh Vikram Singh
“Use” of a trade mark:Since the Plaintiff had alleged infringement under sub-sections (1) to (4) of Section 29, the Court took cognizance of the fact and considered to test whether the defendants were really using “MERCYKIND” as a trade mark. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Alexander Volberding
§ 826.10, emphasis added) Emergency Paid Sick Leave (“EPSL”) does not apply where the employer does not have work for the employee: “An employee subject to one of these orders may not take paid sick leave where the employer does not have work for the employee. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:48 am
., decided 1/29/2009)Does the vicarious liability-immunizing Graves Amendment apply to leased trailers? [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:31 am
If Question 1 is answered in the negative: 2.1    Does a scheme establish 'fair compensation' for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC if the right specified in Question 1(a) applies only where recording media are marketed to natural persons who use the recording media to make reproductions for private purposes? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:46 am by Irina Moutaye
The Conference is being hosted by the ANU College of Law at The Australian National University, Canberra. 29 September 2013 - 1 October 2013. [read post]