Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 141 - 160 of 12,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2021, 7:13 am by Josh Blackman
The Court could issue another decision on Monday, November 29. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 2:24 am by Nedim Malovic
This, in a nutshell, was at the heart of the referral from the Swedish Supreme Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stim and Sami, C-753/18.EU law, as interpreted by the CJEU, provides that a communication to the public may take place – in the manner envisaged by Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 (InfoSoc Directive) – when transmissions are made by means of technical equipment to a nearby public (e.g. in a hotel, café, rehabilitation… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:51 am
.; Does; No. 1-08-CV-107116 (filed 2/29/2008) Fraud lawsuit. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Nothing in the wording of Art. 13(1)(b) Regulation No 510/2006 indicates that evocation is limited to cheeses of the same consistency and taste, as those covered by the specifications.The EUIPO does require proximity between goods concerned (and two sheep milk cheeses would certainly be in proximity). [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:11 pm
The bill passed overwhelmingly (147-0 in the House; 29-1 in the Senate1 ) and has been sent to the Governor. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 10:46 am by Jon Sands
Hudson, No. 19-10227 (1-29-21)(Hawkins w/N. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Ray McKoski
The law does not mention displaying a completed ballot after the fact. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The communication under R 60(1) is dated 29 January 2009 and was sent by registered mail. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:47 am by Diane Tweedlie
The board in arriving at this conclusion does not deviate from G 1/10 (see point 3).1. [read post]
The pilot program will be open starting on January 29, 2024, and will accept up to 20,000 applications, with applications accepted on a rolling basis. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am by Andres
The case was decided in favour of the defendants by a Swedish court in 2010, and it was later appealed and the second court referred it to the CJEU with the following questions: “(1) If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive [2001/29]? [read post]