Search for: "Does 1-32" Results 21 - 40 of 5,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2013, 10:57 am
The Court rejected this argument, stating that "Paragraph 32 of the Agreement does not prohibit Dr. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:00 am by Dan Ernst
Volume 32, Issue 1 (February 2014) of Law and History Review is out on the Cambridge Journals website. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 8:43 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
  Aventis argued that the proposed supply would infringe claims 1 to 4 and 6 of the patent (which, as noted, does not expire until 3 July 2012), while the generics contended that their supply will not infringe the patent and that the patent is invalid in any event. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claims 1 and 9 of the main request, filed on 6 June 2019, read:1. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Blake, 2019 ONSC 4062 [32] As to counsel’s obligation to inform the court as to relevant authorities, two principles emerge: (1) where lawyer knows of a relevant authority, the failure of the lawyer to inform the court of that authority could be seen as an attempt to mislead the court; (2) where a lawyer does not know about authority, ignorance may nonetheless be no excuse. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
Oaks, Habeas Corpus in the States 1776-1865, 32 U. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:35 am
" I don't think it does, but can you imagine Warren bringing a lawsuit and trying to convince a court that a DNA test indicating 1/32nd or only 1/1,024th Native American genes "shows you're an Indian"? [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:07 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Claim 1 of the [new main] request read:1. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 5:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
PatentNo. 7,226,459 as anticipated or obvious in light of theprior art.The anticipation argument touched claims 32-33:Therefore, we affirm the determination that Middle anticipates claims 32 and 33.The Middle reference was mentioned in obviousness arguments:The Board found that Middle discloses most of thelimitations of claims 1–16, 19, and 25–31, but does notdisclose a “drive member including a helical groove. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2004); and In re Lowry, 32 F.3d 1579, 1583-84 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:46 am
Jure Vidmar (Univ. of Oxford - Law) has published Conceptualizing Declarations of Independence in International Law (Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 32, no. 1, p. 153, Spring 2012). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:38 am
According to a recent news report in The Culver City Patch, local law enforcement officials and anti-DUI task forces will conduct 32 DUI checkpoints and 202 DUI patrols between now and January 1, 2012 in Los Angeles County. [read post]