Search for: "Does 1-36" Results 81 - 100 of 5,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division held that Becallo failed to establish a conflict of interest with respect to the supervisor’s personal relationship with the employee.As to Becallo’s allegation concerning the supervisor’s use campaign funds, the Appellate Division concluded that even assuming, arguendo, the use of those funds to pay for a bulk mailing of a Town newsletter to senior citizens was improper, such an impropriety does "not remotely rise to the level required… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
., 2000 SCC 67 as follows: The prohibition against double patenting relates … to the “evergreen” problem … The inventor is only entitled to “a” patent for each invention: Patent Act, s. 36(1). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
R 36(1) as adopted by decision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation of 7 December 2006 (Special edition No. 1, OJ EPO 2007, 89) and the amended versions which entered into force on 1 April and 26 October 2010 (see decisions of the Administrative Council of 25 March 2009, OJ EPO 2009, 296, and of 26 October 2010, OJ EPO 2010, 568) continue to be based on the principle that a divisional application may be filed “relating to any… [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:01 am by tekEditor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 # License: Public Domain.# Author: Joseph Wecker, 2012# Are you tired of trying to remember what .bashrc does vs .bash_profile vs .profile? [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
This depends on whether these umbrella purchasers have a cause of action under s. 36(1) (a). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Therefore, Appellants' have not shown error in the Examiner's finding of a lack of written description support for the claimed subject matter, and we will sustain the rejection of claims 1-19 and 22.As to automating a manual procedure:We conclude that the mere automation of the manual determination does not distinguish the claimed invention. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
TecSec responds that the mandate rule does not apply because it is impossible to glean which issues this court decided when we issued the Rule 36 judgment.This court agrees with TecSec that the mandate rule does not bar it from challenging the district court’s claim construction. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  We don't know, but in Lee v Pierre 2011 NY Slip Op 32911(U); November 1, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County;Docket Number: 403536/10; Judge: Anil C. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 10:04 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Menkes, Monetary Transfer Provisions and the Rule of Law from the International Investment Law Perspective 36 Boris Praštalo, On Corruption in International Arbitration Exploring the Topic through the Lens of the mol v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 12:38 pm
 This does not mean Chapter 13 debtors are immune to unexpected expenses. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:00 pm
 Meanwhile, Temps will dip Wednesday night to 1 degree in Caribou, Maine, 20 in Bahstan, 26 in NYC, 28 in DC, 19 in Hot-lanta, 36 in Tampa, 1 in Chi-town, and our favourite- minus 11 in Minneapolis. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:46 pm
One might expect a simple ‘Yes/No’  answer to the following question within the CML Handbook Part 2 : Does the lender require counterpart/certified copy tenancy agreement to be sent to you? [read post]