Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 1 - 20 of 4,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2012, 9:59 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, Doe #41 has filed his or her reply memorandum.Reply Memorandum of Doe #41 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm by Ray Beckerman
John Does 1-45, Doe #41 has filed a motion to sever John Does 2-45, dismiss the complaint as to them, and quash the related subpoenas.Notice of MotionMemorandum of LawDoe #41 DeclarationMorlan Ty Rogers Affidavit var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, a Manhattan BitTorrent download case, the motion by defendant Doe #41 to sever, dismiss, and quash, has been granted by District Judge Barbara S. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45 Plaintiff's memorandum of law in opposition to motion by Doe #41 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, the plaintiff has filed its papers responding to the motion to quash filed by pro se defendant Doe #8.Plaintiff's time to respond to a separate motion filed by defendant Doe #41 has not run yet.Plaintiff's memorandum of law responding to motion by defendant Doe #8 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:43 am by Marcel Pemsel
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
Where the government does not show that a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property will interfere with a grand jury investigation, it can be granted. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am by Marcel Pemsel
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
25 May 2018, 7:36 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
  This funding is part of the 219 grants totaling $34 million awarded to 183 small businesses in 41 states through the DOE’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 3:01 pm
In contrast to rule 41 (a) (2), rule 41 (a) (1) establishes a procedure for termination of an action without a court order. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:21 pm
Interestingly IRS Publication 1779, which is only two pages does not specifically mention the 20 factor test set forth in IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41, 1987-1 C.B. 296. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:51 pm by Stan Gibson
Rule 41(a)(1) provides: “Voluntary Dismissal. (1) By the Plaintiff. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:00 am by scinaz
  Subsection A does not apply to rule making for any of the following: 1. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
As the government notes, however, the relevant portion of Rule 41 does not include the word “notice. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:09 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  Rule 41(a)(2) provides that: “Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Job 41:1-5 —"Can you pull in Leviathan with a fishhook or tie down its tongue with a rope? [read post]