Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2008, 6:25 pm
Hogan II, 43. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:52 am
§ 43:21-19(i)(6)(A)-(C) (“ABC test”). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:40 pm
Over 90 cases have been reported between January 1 – July 15, 2019 compared to 56 cases in 2018, and 43 cases in 2017 during the same time period. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
First, does s. 43(1)(c) create a distinction based on age, and second, if so, does this distinction create a disadvantage by perpetuating prejudice or stereotyping? [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:28 am
Spa Monopole (the opponent) filed an opposition in May 2015 pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), on the basis of its two earlier registered national trade marks:“SPA” for goods in Class 32 (Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, syrups and other preparations for making beverages), and“LES THERMES DE SPA” for services in Class 44 (Services rendered by a thermal establishment including… [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
That’s unlike §43(a)(1)(A), which courts have held applicable to noncommercial speech, which was the reason they needed to invent Rogersin the first place. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:13 am
Jul. 17, 2020) This memorandum opinion comes with a partial dissent calling out the majority’s differential treatment of §43(a)(1)(A) and (B) claims for unclean hands purposes. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:01 am
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 # License: Public Domain.# Author: Joseph Wecker, 2012# Are you tired of trying to remember what .bashrc does vs .bash_profile vs .profile? [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
[Related: In a Florida Child Custody Case, Does It Matter That I Am Gay?] [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84.[3.11] As the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 is the most narrow and as the wording of the contested feature […] is more precise than in the other requests (for instance, in the main request and in auxiliary requests 1 and 3 “high-speed detection” is not defined via a concrete read-out speed, and the main request does… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:00 am
Id. at *43. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
The court found that Bayer lacked standing under §43(a)(1)(A) and (B) under Lexmark. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:28 am
(3) As to such services, the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.43 P.S. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am
§ 1125(a)(1). [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Such drafting does not endear the lawyer to the judge - or the client - and should be avoided. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:33 am
§ 1125(a)(1)(B). [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:59 am
The term 'employee' shall not include applicants for employment or any other person.43 P.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
I guess we're going to see a mixed ruling.Meanwhile, the panel for next Thursday's Ninth Circuit hearing has become known:Circuit Judge Johnnie Rawlinson, a Clinton appointee who was recommended by then-Senator Harry Reid (the #1 Democrat in the Senate over the course of many years), but is considered "moderate to conservative" (though her categorization as "conservative" appears to be attributable to her law-and-order stance)Circuit Judge Consuelo Callahan,… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
Still, reporting the results together, the ITC and I agree that: (1) 43-47% of respondents at the ITC in the last 15-18 months are respondents named in NPE/PAE investigations; and (2) 19-28% of investigations at the ITC in the last 15-18 months are NPE/PAE-initiated investigations.... [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
In a decision released today, the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that driving with improperly restrained children does not constitute reckless endangerment under state law. [read post]
