Search for: "Does 1-44" Results 61 - 80 of 4,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[1] – ‘Stable Diffusion Litigation’ (website created by attorneys on behalf of the artists) “If a work is transformative…then it’s not a violation of copyright and the plaintiff simply has no ground on which to stand to file a copyright infringement case…[T]hose who refuse to acknowledge advancements in technology and instead fight against them are like whittlers mad at power tools. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It does honor to the distinguished and long running series of which it is now an integral part. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Filing bases for director-initiated: 15 44(e), 14 1(a), 4 66(a). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:07 am by Will Daugherty (US)
If the cyber incident does not involve any physical or pollution effects, it could also be reported directly to CISA. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Artificial intelligence (AI)[1] was the biggest technology news of 2023. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
How does this compare with SEC rulemaking under prior administrations? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 11:30 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Would these be abolished, or would the government assume this right should it exercise its power under Section 44 of the Constitution? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Elspeth Guild
In any event, responsibility does not require a formal agreement between the controllers as regards the purposes and means of processing (para 44). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Alden Abbott
The law does not list the pricing of a license as a grounds justifying march-in. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal made clear that the caselaw on bare comment does not prescribe an inflexible rule compelling a court to treat a statement of opinion as if it were fact where the opinion implies that a claimant has done something but does not indicate what that something is [24]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]