Search for: "Does 1-5, inclusive" Results 61 - 80 of 2,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 8:40 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
————————————————— [1] UK P&I Club Circular October 2015 [2] www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/workshop/wks_capbld/unedocs_summary.pdf [3] Motis Exports [2000] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 211 [4] http://www.essdocs.com/edocs/electronic-bills-of-lading [5] Glencore v MSC [2015] EWHC 1989 (Comm) [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:20 am
But that does not lead to the conclusion that the inclusion of work 'A' in work 'B' is, or is not, "incidental" for the purposes of section 31(1) of the Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from January 1 – February 5, 2021 inclusive. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
That Table 3 and Table 5 have some of the same aspherical values does not readily alert a person of ordinary skill that Table 5 contains an obvious error of “typographical or similar nature. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
Below I discuss 5 prominent issues which are raised by these changes and that are elaborated upon in the book: 1. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:38 am by Josephine J Dawuni
So, how can the plethora of feminist voices be incorporated in the global agenda for more women on international courts in order to create an all-inclusive bench? [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
  Just because the particular data may appear relevant and/or it might be useful to the database’s users, does not in and of itself justify the inclusion of that data in the database. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:24 am by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
A group that comprises less than 1/2 of 1 percent of Florida Attorneys.''It is absolutely clear from this record that [Super Lawyer does] not permit a lawyer to buy one's way onto the list, nor is there any requirement for the purchase of any product for inclusion in the lists or any quid pro quo of any kind or nature associated with the evaluation and listing of an attorney or in the subsequent advertising of one’s … [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 5:25 pm by Dean T. Kirby, Jr.
In holding otherwise, the BAP quoted In re Brown, 346 B.R. 868, 873 (Bankr.N.D.Fla.2006): “Just because § 506 does not apply does not mean that there is no secured claim. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
She is the author of Talking to Strangers[1] written in 2004 which focuses on interracial distrust in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:33 am by John Jascob
The court noted that he conceded that Section 78m(b)(2), (5) is not one of the fraud statutes listed in Section 1514A(a)(1) and is not a “provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:43 am by Morgan Weiland
While the amendment’s inclusion of student journalists is laudable, it does nothing for those students who do not work for a “journalistic publication” at their college or university—or for those students the moment they graduate. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by admin
Saying that a tail is a leg does not make it a leg. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:02 am
The rating takes place at the rating physician's office and lasts approximately one (1) hour depending on the impairment. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
Importantly, the CRTC appears to have agreed that the mere inclusion of these types of features does not require enhanced consent. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Whether the criteria of exclusion is intersectional in nature, i.e. defined by another characteristic like age does not perforce justify that criteria as non-discriminatory upon any reasonable interpretation of Article 15(1).[16]Similarly, the argument that permission to enter other temples justifies denial of entry at Sabarimala is tantamount to saying that discrimination is not discrimination when made selectively. [read post]