Search for: "Does 1-50" Results 121 - 140 of 15,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The State alleged the father was unfit on five grounds. (750 ILCS 50/1 (D)(m)(i); 750 ILCS 50/1 (D)(m)(ii); 750 ILCS 50/1 (D)(b); 750 ILCS 50/1 (D)(i); and 750 ILCS 50/1 (D)(g)). [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
Under a new California law effective January 1, 2009. it is now illegal write, send, or read a "text-based communication" while driving. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 4:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eric Gardiner of the Hollywood Reporter. 50 million users on MegaUpload on a daily basis. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:00 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
More onerous is the tax imposed if P does not make a required minimum distribution after reaching his or her "required beginning date" (RBD), which generally is April 1 of the year after the year in which P reaches age 70 1/2. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
[And] it is again unclear what would be the purpose or effect of assessing a $50 fine against an anonymous defendant, or how the court would expect to collect $50 from "Jane Doe. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:11 am by Jon Gelman
"The Appellate Court stated:Although N.J.S.A. 34:15–54  does not expressly create an exception to the oneyearrequirement for filing a motion for reinstatement, our courts have recognizedthat compensation judges possess the inherent power to excuse the one-year timebar upon the grounds set forth in Rule  4:501. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Issue number 1 is: when does a party waive her objection to her opponent's failure to comply with the 28-day deadline to file post-trial motions? [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 11:58 am by David Oxenford
  The implication is that the FCC does not intend to do anything with the June inquiry any time soon, so the July 1 deadline remains in place. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm by Adam Wagner
Some of these will be not worth the paper they are written on, but many are genuine claims and to ignore them when considering the court statistics is to miss most of what the court does. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  Of course a home exercise program is important, but only if the injured worker (1) actually does it at home and (2) does it as often as they are supposed to. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:38 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
” It is notable that the new exception does not contain the requirement that the employer has a good faith belief that the employee (or potential employee) was under the influence of, or impaired by, cannabis that the original version of Section 10-50(e)(1) contained. [read post]