Search for: "Does 1-53" Results 61 - 80 of 3,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 7:16 pm by Eric Schweibenz
No. 337-TA-692) granting in part Respondents motion to compel Complainants to respond to interrogatory nos. 5 and 54 and request for production nos. 1, 13, 27, 53, 79, 105, 132-157 and 159-161. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:33 am
That same year, about 1 700 Florida residents were killed as a result of a fall. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
  What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:24 am by Nico Cordes
In the present case, the method claim 1 does not define the meaning of the "transformed per pixel information". [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” In its decision G 1/07 [headnote 2a], which has been issued in the meantime, the Enlarged Board has confirmed that “a claim which comprises a step encompassing an embodiment which is a “method for treatment of the human or animal body by surgery” within the meaning of A 53(c) cannot be left to encompass that embodiment. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:22 am
., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2), unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95, assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (1), strangulation in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-64bb, and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes §… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:27 am by Administrator
Accordingly, while the Act to amend creates a presumption of accuracy similar in nature to the one previously in place by virtue of s. 258(1)(g) of the Code (see s. 320.31(1)), the Act to amend does not include any new presumption of identity similar to what had previously existed in s. 258(1)(c) of the Code. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:43 am
The defendant, Thomas C., appeals from the judgment of conviction of risk of injury to a child  in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:43 am
The defendant, Thomas C., appeals from the judgment of conviction of risk of injury to a child  in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:22 am
Because we are not persuaded that the legislature intended to punish offenders for conspiring to commit crimes that they never agreed or intended to commit, we conclude that § 53a-48 (a) does impose such a requirement. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:36 am
In accordance with Article 112(1)(a) EPC, Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04 has referred the following points of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal with interlocutory decision of 8 July 2013 in case T 83/05: 1. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:30 am
Under Article 164(1) EPC the Implementing Regulations are an integral part of the Convention and, hence, are equally binding to the Boards of Appeal of the EPO (Article 23(3) EPC) and to national courts.In combined cases G 2/12 and G 2/13 (“Tomato II” and “Broccoli II”), the Enlarged Board of Appeal had concluded – taking into account the legislative history of Article 53(b) and Rule 27(b) EPC as well as of Article 4 of Directive 98/44/EC – that… [read post]