Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 41 - 60 of 3,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The post Recruitment Does Not End After the Interview appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board does not see any reason for reaching a different conclusion because the introduction of the disclaimer into claim 1 and the addition of claim 8 comply with the requirements of A 123(2) and the decisions G 1/03 and G 2/10. [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:29 am
Here's the abstract:Contemporary international criminal law suggests that head of state immunity does not extend to atrocity crimes, but the executive's office continues to be the safest place for suspected perpetrators. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 11:01 am by oliver randl
Both are mentioned in headnote 2.1 of G 1/03, but A 54(3) prior art is not necessarily accidental. [read post]
The Commission is mandated by Article 54 BMR to conduct a review of certain provisions of the BMR and to submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 1 January 2020. [read post]
30 May 2019, 10:59 am by Leanne Winkels
The Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund (TLDEF), together with Pro Bono partner Reed Smith, filed a constitutional challenge to Pennsylvania statute 54 PaCS § 702(c)(1)–(2). [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:54 am
As this CNN piece details, "Michael Vick has agreed to pay nearly $1 million for the care of about 54 pit bulls found on his property during a dogfighting raid. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Prakash Shah, Does Durkheim Enhance Our Understanding of Law and Religion? [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 9:49 am
The independent claim of the patent features a generic chemical formula which, due to the variable nature of the described substituents, encompasses a number of alternatives but does not specifically define each alternative. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 The board also does not consider the document mentioned by the appellant, i.e. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 The board also does not consider the document mentioned by the appellant, i.e. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 1:05 pm
" * 54 percent of corporate counsel attorneys said their company does not have a designated technical witness for deposition about electronic data systems and management—a so-called 30(b)(6) deponent. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
And, because the court’s contempt order does not dispose of any claims in this case, the requirements for certification under Rule 54(b) are not satisfied." [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:12 pm
The Opposition Division (OD) came to the conclusion that Claim 1 of the auxiliary request was novel over the A 54(3) document D8 because the skilled person had to make several selections in order to arrive at the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:12 pm
The Opposition Division (OD) came to the conclusion that Claim 1 of the auxiliary request was novel over the A 54(3) document D8 because the skilled person had to make several selections in order to arrive at the claimed subject-matter. [read post]