Search for: "Does 1-6" Results 61 - 80 of 39,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2024, 11:35 am by Richard West
  Sources: [1] Ohio Bankruptcy Means Test – Chapter 7? [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:38 am by Holly
Raghu, according to the fact pattern of scenario 1, provided the inputs to the pre-trained DNN which narrowed down candidate compounds.[6] Under the first factor of Pannu, this contribution could be considered a “significant” contribution to conception, according to the U.S.P.T.O. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Likewise, the characterization of cannabis as a health hazard does not mean that it is, in fact, dangerous or that is does not offer significant medicinal benefits. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
He began his pro career in 1995 with the Houston Astros and was employed continuously thereafter by a host of major league teams, including the Los Angeles Dodgers from December 6, 2004, to October 15, 2005, and again from February 2, 2009, to November 9, 2009. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Table 1: Phase-Out Policy Stages, Timeline, and Requirements Stage Effective Date Requirements to be met unless otherwise exempt   Stage 1 May 6, 2025 Labs must have procedures in place to comply with the following:   ·        Medical Device Reporting (21 C.F.R. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The New Article 17(1) MAR Raises Several Questions A significant question relates to the concept of a “protracted process,” as referred to in the new Article 17(1) MAR. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:18 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 am by Frank Cranmer
The provision in Paragraph 1.20 of the Homelessness Code that housing authorities should consider the human rights implications of their actions “does not compel decision-makers to identify rights and potential violations, nor does it disturb the message in Denbigh [R (SB) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15] that human rights are respected through outcomes, not processes” [36]. [read post]