Search for: "Does 1-6" Results 101 - 120 of 39,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 11:25 am by John Floyd
She is facing federal obstruction charges for tampering with documents central to the 1/6 investigation as well as concealing evidence against her clients. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:36 am by Grant
  Trial Court allowed the interlocutory appeal.The Court of Appeals found that simply because a party may fall into more than one category in U.C.A. 78B-6-120(1), does not mean that the person must follow all the requirements of each category he falls. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:22 am
Today, the ECJ delivered the judgment in case C-462/06 (Laboratoires Glaxosmithkline) dealing with the interpretation of Art. 6 point 1 and Section 5 of Chapter II of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:55 am
A pair of folks from the American Bar Association argue that easy access to criminal records prevents millions of folks (1 of 6 Americans has a criminal record) with long-ago priors and/or fairly minor convictions from reentering society and [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:36 am by Karen Breda
The Court granted review on 4 issues: 1) does Congress have power under Article I to enact the minimum essential coverage mandate in Section 1501 of PPACA, 2) is the minimum essential coverage mandate [read post]
3 Jun 2004, 8:22 am
The court's 6-1 ruling, which only advises but does not require an August vote, is seen as a victory for Democrats who hoped to keep the issue from November ballots and possibly bolstering Republican turnout in that election. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:56 am
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of California [official website] on Monday held 6-1 [opinion, PDF] that a state ban on preferential hiring practices for minorities and women does not violate the federal Constitution [text]. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:23 am
In this order, the First District certified the following to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance: DOES THE ENABLING STATUTE FOR CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, § 627.351(6), FLA. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm by Amy A. Breyer
Currently, there are no laws to go after an abuser who does not follow a court order.A second animal cruelty conviction, under the new bill, will be a felony and will land the abuser in prison for 1-6 years.Read more at TriCities.com. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:03 am by Paul Caron
Following up on my previous posts: July 2019 Florida Bar Exam Results: Florida International Is #1 For 5th Year In A Row (Sept. 16, 2019) How Does FIU Law School Do It? [read post]