Search for: "Does 1-68" Results 21 - 40 of 2,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophia Hassel
The burden of proof is also on the claimant to show this damage (MediaMarkt at 61 and 68 and Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite at 84). [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
  First, a set of Draft Principles were circulated in November 2010.[1]  After a period set aside for public comment and following revision of the text,[2] the SRSG circulated the final version of the UNGP (with an included Official Commentary) in March 2011 annexed to his (final) 2011 SRSG Report,[3] the text of which was substantially revised from the circulated November 2010 Draft. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
In light of these disagreements, it is worth taking a step back, and exploring the scope of these requirements in some more depth. 1. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Artificial intelligence (AI)[1] was the biggest technology news of 2023. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by News Desk
For example, the laboratory record dated March 3, 2023, indicates the sample receipt date as March 1, 2023. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
She stated that she was the primary driver and that her boyfriend does not drive the Cadillac. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, s.1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 means that claimants now have to prove that the publication caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm by admin
Socrates viewed philosophy as beginning in wonder,[1] but Socrates and his philosophic heirs recognized that philosophy does not get down to business until it starts to clarify the terms of discussion. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Cargill this term, the Court has been asked to decide the narrow question of whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in the National Firearms Act.[1] However, embedded within the case is an issue that raises broad administrative law questions about how the rule of lenity interacts with agencies’ interpretations of statutes with criminal implications. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
Under s.1(1) if a publication does not cause, or is not likely to cause, serious harm to reputation it is not defamatory. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm by Shea Denning
Thus, Forney does not resolve the question of whether an officer’s failure to restart the observation period renders the results inadmissible. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the close-to-close trading sessions affected by a short report, defendant issuers’ stock price declined by 16.8%, on average, and incurred additional declines of 16.0% during the 90-day look-back period of Section 21D(e)(1) of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act.[3][4] Third, Rule 10b-5 private securities fraud lawsuits based primarily on activist short-seller research may not be indicative of actual fraud-on-the-market since the work product does not… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
” Simply owning an invention-generating machine does not confer legal rights in the machine’s creations absent some other recognized legal principle. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The provisions primarily at issue in the litigation on appeal were (1) the term extension to 2085 and (2) an amendment that eliminated the 1987 limitations on repairs, additions and betterments, and added costs for capital improvements approved by DWR and 80% of the contractors. [read post]