Search for: "Does 1-68"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 1:45 pm
Underwood, 244 N.C. 68 (1956). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
While this is not a common occurrence, it does happen. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
” James Pooley, Trade Secrets § 2.02[1] (2010). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:07 pm
To do so would defeat the purpose of Rule 68. [47] Neither party has brought an application under Rule 68(7) for an order that Rule 68 does not apply. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 11:39 am
” In a 2-1 decision, the Court of Appeals held that the decision in Cheeks does not extend to Rule 68 offers of judgment. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
See Pub.L. 104-191 §264(a, c) (uncodified).The administrative response was the so-called HIPAA Privacy Rule ("Privacy Rule"), effective April 14, 2003. 68 Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
Roland, 50 M.J. 66, 68 (1999); United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:33 pm
That does not mean all case under $100,000 are appropriately litigated under Rule 68. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
” 750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(1)(B) Any marriage that lasted under 5 years is not going to be a lot of maintenance. 33% of net income of the payor minus 25% of the income of the recipient for less than a year simply doesn’t amount to much. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Reimbursement of the appeal fee – R 67 EPC 1973 (applicable here)The Board of appeal is of the opinion that the decision issued by the OD is insufficiently reasoned and, therefore, does not satisfy the requirements of R 68(2) EPC 1973, which applies in the present case. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
Following an in camera inspection, Supreme Court concluded that the 68 pages of proposed questions did not fall with the “law enforcement exemption” and ordered the release of those pages. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
Following an in camera inspection, Supreme Court concluded that the 68 pages of proposed questions did not fall with the “law enforcement exemption” and ordered the release of those pages. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:06 am
The Second Circuit (Wesley, Carney and Rakoff [D.J.]) rejects that argument, for the following reasons:1. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:52 pm
Vickery browbeat him into signing off,Rule 60(b)(1) does not provide recourse, and the districtcourt did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 12:49 am
In the game of “where does our money go,” I think these numbers are very important. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:21 am
See Defendants’ Reply Memorandum, at 9- 1 1. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:31 pm
In ruling on his argument, the court applied the Blockburger test which, as noted earlier, says that if each charge requires proof of a fact which the other does not, then they aren't the same offense and the defendant can be prosecuted for, convicted of and punished for both. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 4:38 am
See Dkt. 68, 14." [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:55 pm
The commencement of a proceeding without the Rule 68 endorsement does not change the character of the proceeding to permit process outside the limits of the rule. [13] The defendants' motion is dismissed. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
Maclean Hunter Market Reports, Inc., 44 F.3d 61, 68 (2d Cir. 1994)). [read post]
