Search for: "Does 1-73"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant was established within the Department of State and tasked with "administering, enforcing, and interpreting New York state's ethics and lobbying laws" (Executive Law § 94 [1] [a]), including Public Officers Law §§ 73, 73-a, 74; Legislative Law art 1-A; and Civil Service Law § 107. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
Here are three reasons liberals need moderates: 1. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 9:46 pm
Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 73 n.1, and Mancusi v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm
He strangled Carolyn Osman, 73, to death. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Sept. 1, 2011)(J. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:20 pm
Under what circumstances does common general knowledge require proof? [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
§§ 501-33, 669-1 (1993). [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:40 am
Conversely, a sign that has additional meaning(s) does not constitute a mere geographical name. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
Say-on-Pay: Now 71 Failures - How Does That Compare With My Early Season Poll? [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
The Supreme Court’s construction of VATA, s 73(6)(b), does not allow HMRC to raise assessments excessively out of time as VATA, s 77, prohibits the making of assessments for the relevant accounting period after a particular period of years. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:32 am
" (1 Dobbs, The Law of Torts (2001) § 224, p. 573.) [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Gregory,534 U.S. 1, 15-16 (2001) (Ginsburg, J., concurring in thejudgment); In re Hedged-Investments Assocs., 48 F.3d 470,472-73 (10th Cir. 1995); South Carolina Nat. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Decision T 84/02 cited by the opponents and by the Board and decision T 73/88 are, therefore, contradictory, and, moreover, contrary to balance between the parties.The Board admits that the expression “by way of cross-appeal” does not fit very well into the procedural system of appeals under the EPC. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 11:38 am
Section 614 (a)(1)(D)(ii)(I). [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:29 pm
Section 614 (a)(1)(D)(ii)(I). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 3:32 pm
No. 73-31-4), which is a neurohormone and is an unapproved food additive under Section 409 of the Act [21 USC 348]. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:13 am
§§ 501-33, 669-1 (1993). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
Nevertheless, in relation to consumer disputes, the recent amendment under the Consumer Protection Law envisages an exception under Article 73/A and provides that where the consumer does not attend the first meeting of the mediation process without a valid excuse he/she shall not be liable of the legal costs and the fees of his/her attorney can be collected from the other party where he/she receives a judgement in his/her favour. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:13 am
Your choice does matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:13 am
Your choice does matter. [read post]
