Search for: "Does 1-87"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
According to A 87(1), a requirement for enjoying a right [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:01 am
(via Getty Images) The post How Much Prison Time Does Former President Trump Face? [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:46 am
When does a lack of clarity "arise out of" an amendment? [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
On 1 November 2021, three days after the publication of the President’s Report on Transparency, Mostyn J handed down judgment in a case called BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87; [2022] 1 WLR 1349. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
As the Opponent's have pointed out, even a one off contradictory decision by a Board of Appeal does not necessarily justify a referral.Following a heated debate, the Opponents succeeded in preventing a referral to the EBA today. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
T 331/87 [3]) according to which the replacement or removal of a claim feature is admissible provided that it does not require any real modification of other features [to compensate for the change], there is also a risk that it is applied in a wrong way (as in the present case […]) because it is not clear what is meant by “no real modification”. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
No. 87-36, § 4.14, 11-16-87; Ord. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Hard Drive's work does not promote the progress of science. 87. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
1. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
Burke, 517 F.2d 377, 386-87 (2d Cir. 1975). [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
(How does a judge get several tickets?) [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 6:56 pm
Rev. 871, 885-87 (1992). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:11 pm
., 176 S.W.3d 80, 87 (Tex. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
So, Justice Scalia doubled his laugh total from day 1. [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:44 am
Does this mean that Conten [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:52 pm
Does 1-16, a case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the students have filed a reply memorandum of law in support of their motion to quash.Among other things, defendants argued:Plaintiffs .... point to this Court's granting of their ex parte request for discovery as proof of the facial validity of their claims, but this argument cannot be taken seriously. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:12 pm
Gross, 227 Ill. 2d 78, 87-88, 879 N.E. 2d 278 (2007). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
As the records before the Appellate Division “makes no reference to a criminal investigation implicating [Petitioners}, nor does it suggest that state or local law enforcement officials would be involved in the proposed interrogation of them, the court found that the law enforcement exemption embodied in Public Officers Law §87 (2) (e) (iv) was inapplicable to the documents at issue . [read post]
