Search for: "Does 1-87"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
See Rule 4:87-1A signed certification of one or more beneficiaries is needed. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:08 am
According to Art. 87(1) EPC, any person who has filed a patent in a state a party to the Paris Convention, or his successor in title, shall enjoy such a priority right to the same invention for a subsequent application. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
[2.1] The applicant argues that since the omitted feature - the struts - is clearly presented as optional in the previous applications, the three conditions set out in T 331/87 should not be applied to the present case and that therefore, obviously, this feature could be removed from the claim without contravening the requirements of A 76(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
What is the correct ground for rejection when the claimed subject-matter does not achieve the alleged technical effect? [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:22 am
Swiss Reinsurance, 248 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2001). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Making an A 123(2) assessment dependent on such an external element does not sound right, does it? [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division noted that draft IDR request "does not contain statistical or factual tabulations or data … or final agency policies or determinations but rather consisted “solely of . . . evaluations, recommendations and other subjective material and was therefore exempt from disclosure;" 4. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:05 am
, 87 Missouri Law Review 435 (2022). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:34 am
[87] and The Committee has concluded in paragraph 87 that the established jurisprudence of the EU Courts prevents access to judicial review procedures of acts and omissions by EU institutions, when acting as public authorities. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:56 am
At the end, the board does concede though that in other situations this argument might work. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:01 pm
Does not include battle deaths. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
" The Appellate Division said that Supreme Court properly concluded that Petitioner did not acquire tenure by estoppel,** explaining:1. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
The appeal is therefore insufficiently reasoned and does not comply with the requirements of A 108. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
In particular: when does the actual transfer need to take place? [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
*Citing McManus v Board of Educ. of Hempstead Union Free School District, 87 NY2d 183, the Appellate Division affirmed a Supreme Court's ruling that annulled New York City Department of Education's [DOE] discontinuing Petitioner's employment and directed the educator's reinstatement to her former position as a tenured teacher with back salary. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
*Citing McManus v Board of Educ. of Hempstead Union Free School District, 87 NY2d 183, the Appellate Division affirmed a Supreme Court's ruling that annulled New York City Department of Education's [DOE] discontinuing Petitioner's employment and directed the educator's reinstatement to her former position as a tenured teacher with back salary. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:24 pm
§ 87-803(1). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
La Corte sostuvo que:1. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Even though enteral feeding does not cure the underlying cause, it clearly alleviates and lessens the symptoms thereof. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, said the court, Civil Rights Law §50-b(1) "does not justify a blanket denial of a request for any documents relating to a sex crime. [read post]
