Search for: "Does 1-89"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
(2) If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, must it then be accepted that in circumstances such as those in the case at issue, the mere presence in a Member State of such goods (which have been placed under a duty suspension arrangement in that Member State) does not prejudice, or cannot prejudice, the functions of the trade mark, with the result that the trade mark proprietor which invokes national trade mark rights in that Member State cannot oppose that presence? [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:08 pm
How long does it take to drive across North America? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
Wiley, 89 N.J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:03 pm
Stated intentions of Wisconsin primary voters by party ID, data from 2016 and 2018 partyID Republican primary Democratic primary Won’t vote Both Don’t know Refused Rep 89 2 5 1 3 0 Lean Rep 77 4 9 1 7 1 Ind 25 16 17 3 36 4 Lean Dem 7 75 8 1 9 1 Dem 2 89 5 1 3 0 An identical share (2%) of Republicans and Democrats planned to vote in the other party’s primary. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
When Macy’s offered the book for 89 cents, the publisher sued. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
However, in the present case this conclusion is only correct with regard to a decision to correct the grant decision pursuant to R 89, since such a decision does not involve a substantive amendment to the decision. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 as granted read :1. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:58 pm
Call us today at 1-877-746-5680 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:05 am
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 1-8)).John Witte, Restoring the Value(s) of Religion in American Public Education, (in Stephen Pickard, Michael Welker, and John Witte, Jr. eds., The Impact of Education on Character Formation, Ethical Education, and the Communication of Values in Late Modern Pluralistic Societies (Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt GmbH, 2022), 89-106).Shlomo Pill, Ariel Liberman, & J.R. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Ms H argued that s.89(1) was engaged, as Mrs H was a secure periodic tenant who died. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Ms H argued that s.89(1) was engaged, as Mrs H was a secure periodic tenant who died. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
The test for inventive step does not apply in the case of overlapping ranges because there is no technical gap to bridge. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
(1) Subject to sections 91 and 123, the corporation shall repair the units and common elements after damage. 1998, c. 19, s. 89 (1). [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:32 am
Readers will remember that article 89 states that: “1. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:01 pm
No insufficiency with regard to powders having non-smoothened particle surfaces could therefore arise, since such powders would not be covered by claim 1.The board does not agree with the [patent proprietor’s] argument.Firstly, such an inherent restriction is not derivable from the opposed patent in the context of the bulk density. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
Ruminations 89: 2019 in Epigrams and Aphorisms:Ruminations 89(1) (Blasphemies).Ruminations 89(2) (Cults and Cult Objects).Ruminations 89(3) (Impeachments).Ruminations 89(4) (Data, Discretion, and Analytics in the State-Enterprise Complex).Ruminations 89(5) (The "Jewish Question" as Global Social Ordering)Ruminations 89(6) (Metamorphosis) Metamorphosis, transformation, these are the key concepts that gave form to… [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
§ 924(j)(1), among other offenses. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 10:05 am
1.1 seems to be straightforward about it – Part 3 covers claims where the Court’s discretion to postpone possession is limited by s.89(1) Housing Act 1980. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
” [2.3] According to the appellant, its view on the interpretation of a claim was confirmed by T 476/89, T 544/89, T 565/89 and T 952/90. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical with that [read post]
