Search for: "Does 1-89"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm
In particular, Ouest SCS failed to bring any evidence that the distribution of Chanel samples in authorised point of sales does amount to trade mark exhaustion. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
According to this Board, the interpretation of those decisions ignores the fact that Article 114(2) EPC does not justify such discretion, as previous case law has repeatedly stated. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am
Does that disclose that the heater may be absent? [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm
4) There is a direct relationship between economic standing and the effects of 1-3. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:03 pm
Mason, 89 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), the Third District held that Aventura’s ordinance was a valid exercise of municipal power under section 316.008(1)(w). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:07 am
Registration of the earlier trade mark in the Member State concerned does not constitute a prerequisite for the running of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence prescribed in Article 9(1) of Directive 89/104. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
See In re Heeb Media LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1071 (TTAB 2008) (applicant's good intentions and inoffensive goods and services do not prevent finding that HEEB is disparaging; mixed opinion among members of the referenced group does not erase the perception of a substantial composite who find it disparaging). [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
’”) Accordingly, we sustain the rejection of claims 1-67, 69-89, and 91-96 as unpatentable over Kuechler and Miller.Even when ExxonMobil won on a point, the bigger battle was still lost:Although Patent Owner persuades us that the stated rationale forcombining Mulvaney and Kuechler is insufficient, it has failed to persuadeus that the claims are patentable over Mulvaney and Jorgensen. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
In other words, the power conferred by A 21(1) to the boards of appeal to review decisions shall not be transferred to the appellants. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:08 am
Holderman, 465 U.S. 89. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:56 am
§ 203(s)(1)(A). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
" 89 Ill. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
The second anomaly is that sub-section (1) of section 89 imports the final stage of conciliation referred to in section 73(1) of the AC Act into the pre-ADR reference stage under section 89 of the Code. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:23 am
However, this is not necesarily so as the ICC can determine admissibility on its own motion (Art. 19(1)) and Art. 89(2) suggests that even in that case the obligation to surrender is suspended. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
If the ED had had any doubt whatsoever in this respect, it would have had to contact the applicant to clarify whether OPs pursuant to A 116(1) had indeed been requested or not, because this is an inalienable right of parties to proceedings before the EPO (see T 668/89 [3]; T 95/04 [3]). [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 7:00 am
Thus, the Middle District of Alabama was ranked 1. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 5:37 am
Co., 119 Va. at 627, 89 S.E. at 866). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 3:22 pm
Should you be in the unfortunate circumstance of having an auto accident and would like the guidance of an experienced lawyer, please PHONE CARDONE at 504-522-3333 or 1-888-89 CARDONE. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:47 am
Wantock, 323 U.S. 126, 65 S.Ct. 165, 89 L.Ed. 118 (1944), rehearing denied, 323 U.S. 818, 65 S.Ct. 427, 89 L.Ed. 649 (1945), and Skidmore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Supp. 2d 89, 90 (D. [read post]
