Search for: "Does 1-95"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
The post How Does Diminished Value Affect My Virginia Car Accident Claim? [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
Does the resale of vehicles and replacement parts thereof amount to genuine use of a trade mark under Article 12(1) of Directive 2008/95/EC (the former Trade Mark Directive) [now Article 19 of Directive 2015/2436]? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
’ Today the CJEU ruled as follows: "1. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
The public interest objective underlying the application of the three grounds for refusal of registration set out in Article 3(1)(e) of Directive 2008/95 precludes refusal of registration where none of those three grounds is fully applicable. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:00 am
House Bill 4434 accomplishes several things:(1) The UTSA piece is unremarkable, but it does require the identification of the subject trade secret "with sufficient particularly under the circumstances of the case" before beginning discovery. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:29 pm
On I-95 between the Florida and South Carolina lines, it is pretty much the same. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
The Call is Free, the Relief can be valuable. 1-877-793-9290 . [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
The Call is Free, the Relief can be valuable. 1-877-793-9290 . [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84.[3.11] As the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 is the most narrow and as the wording of the contested feature […] is more precise than in the other requests (for instance, in the main request and in auxiliary requests 1 and 3 “high-speed detection” is not defined via a concrete read-out speed, and the main request does… [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm
However, workers’ compensation does not account for all the types of damages an individual can suffer in an accident. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
Although the written description requirement under § 112 does not demand (1) any particular form of disclosure, or (2) the Specification recite the claimed invention verbatim, a description that merely renders the invention obvious does not satisfy the requirement. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm
., No. 05-95-01771-CV, 1997 WL 78913 at *2 (Tex. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:08 pm
Your client is making statements that can be used against him in a court of law when he does his evaluation. 9 times out of 10, probably even more, this is okay. 95% of cases result in plea bargains, right? [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
Therefore, Appellants' have not shown error in the Examiner's finding of a lack of written description support for the claimed subject matter, and we will sustain the rejection of claims 1-19 and 22.As to automating a manual procedure:We conclude that the mere automation of the manual determination does not distinguish the claimed invention. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:36 am
No. 95-32 at ¶ 25.) [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:40 pm
Newsroom Note: this update does not contain much detail, but more information will be released as it becomes available. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 10:34 am
”What does this mean for creativity? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:33 am
All of the Act's provisions have been effective since January 1, 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:20 pm
For 2014, the shared responsibility payment/penalty equals the greater of 1% of annual income or $95 per person. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:51 pm
If the presumption of advancement continues to apply to matters under Part 5 of the FLA, does section 95 of the FLA provide sufficient flexibility to allow a Court to address any alleged unfairness caused by excluded property being converted to family property? [read post]
