Search for: "Does 1-97" Results 21 - 40 of 2,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2020, 5:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 27 Motion to Enforce Automatic Stay 73-1 LDF Motion to Dismiss 74-1 LDF Businsess Corp Motion to Dismiss 82 Response to 73 84 Response to 74 92 Reply in Support of 73 93 Reply in Support of 74 97-1 Surreply 111 LDF Surreply to the Surreply 112 LDF Business Corp Surreply to the Surreply 113 Order [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Atiq, Reasonable Moral Doubt, (97 N.Y.U. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:10 am by Jonathan J. Russell
The new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“2017 Tax Cuts Act”) P.L. 115-97, doubled the Estate and Gift tax “Applicable Exclusion Amount,” from $5 million to $10 million, for gifts made, and estates of decedents dying, after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 1 Habeas Petition.pdfDownload 42 Tribal Court Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload 48 Nygaard Response.pdfDownload 54 Reply.pdfDownload 69 DCT Order Denying Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload 79 Nygaard Motion for Summary J.pdfDownload 83 Tribal Court Motion for Summary J.pdfDownload 91 State Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload 93 State Opposition to Tribal Court Motion.pdfDownload 95 Tribal Court Response.pdfDownload 97 Nygaard Reply.pdfDownload 101 Nygaard… [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:39 pm by David Friedman
It does so by lumping together categories 1-3 and reporting only the sum and by repeatedly referring to "the consensus" but never stating clearly what that consensus is. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
Can a European patent application be refused under Article 97(2) EPC if it claims the same subject-matter as a European patent granted to the same applicant which does not form part of the state of the art pursuant to Article 54(2) and (3) EPC? [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board does not agree with this finding.2.2 The Board considers at least the following features of claim 1 to be o [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 4:13 am
Furthermore, since EUTM 1 does not designate any particular colour, its protection also extends to colour combinations including the combination of red and white. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
 One thing that does strike this Kat is that in the first of this series of cases, EP 1 210 115, directed towards a dosage regime of trastuzumab, was held to be invalid on the basis that the skilled person would attempt a trial of the claimed regime; there was no need for a fair expectation of a positive outcome of the trial - only sufficient expectation to actually conduct it. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Samuel Moyn, Thomas Pink, John Finnis & Lorenzo Zucca, Christian Human Rights: A Debate, (King's Law Journal, Vol 28.1 (2017), p.1-50).Barry W. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
According to the case law of the Boards of appeal the requirement of equity is met when the behaviour of a party does not comply with the due care it may be expected to show. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
However, in that sense the word ‘so’ does not provide any factual information, i.e. does not convey a concept. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Such a definition does not except the claimed apparatus from patentability under A 53(c).The reasoning of T 775/97 [2.6] is not applicable to the present case, as the underlying situation is entirely different. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:07 pm
The reasoning of T 623/97 does not explicitly take into account a possible synergy between successive stages, in which case the stages could not be treated separately. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:07 pm
The reasoning of T 623/97 does not explicitly take into account a possible synergy between successive stages, in which case the stages could not be treated separately. [read post]