Search for: "Does 1-97" Results 61 - 80 of 2,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
In addition, as noted in decision T 168/99 [1] cited by the patent proprietor, withdrawal of subject-matter does not necessarily mean that it has formally been abandoned. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
In addition, as noted in decision T 168/99 [1] cited by the patent proprietor, withdrawal of subject-matter does not necessarily mean that it has formally been abandoned. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 1:13 pm
For the season we are 337-87 in calling the game winner and 98-97-3 against the spread. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:11 pm by Chip Merlin
In nine months, United Property Insurance lost 97% of its tangible book value per share. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The applicant does not agree, and wants the receiving section to decide that the figures were present. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The applicant does not agree, and wants the receiving section to decide that the figures were present. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am by Diane Tweedlie
G 3/97 and G 4/97), the consequence of which being that the opposition is inadmissible? [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With communication of 11 December 2008 the Receiving Section issued a noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC in respect of European application No. 05 858 797.3, informing the original applicant that the application was deemed to be withdrawn (Rule 160(1) EPC) for non-performance of the acts required by Rule 159(1) EPC for entry into the European phase.VI. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
On the other hand, if a warning could be expected merely as a courtesy service from the EPO, its omission again does not create legitimate expectations, see G 2/97 [5.1].[8] As stated above, an overlooking of the error by the Registrar could also not be realistically excluded. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Not enough proofThis opponent tried to prove that Claim 1 of the main request had been orally disclosed. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:03 am by Oliver G. Randl
If the applicant does not approve the text, the application is to be refused according to A 97(1), since the EPC does not provide any other sanction in this case. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:39 pm by rob@howarddc.com
  EPA’s concern with this policy is, in part, that: [T]he method in PRN 97-2 does not accurately measure economic incentive to register pesticides. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Wilming in epi Information 1/2011, p. 31. [read post]