Search for: "Does 2-13" Results 141 - 160 of 19,884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
comes the breaking news that the Court of Appeal of Hamm just upheld the Bielefeld District Court decision (Urt. v. 15.05.2014, Az. 22 U 60/13). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
The Eighth Circuit rejected that argument, and declined to adopt the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning in Todd, holding that the plain language of Section 13(b) indicates that “knowledge” is only required for criminal liability under Section 13(b)(4) and (5), and not for civil liability under Section 13(b)(2) or Rule 13b2-2. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:06 pm by V.D.RAO
The respondent-Bank had issued notice under Section 13 (2) of the Act in April, 2003, which is less than four years. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:38 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search Run March 2, 2008. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 13, May 18, May 25, June 1 and June 8 conferences; rescheduled before the Dec. 2, Dec. 9, Jan. 6 and May 11 conferences)  Luczak v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:26 am
Defending the forbidden treeThus, Art. 13(2) PVR Regulation does not prohibit per se the exploitation of plant varieties to produce fruits. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:20 am

 Lerach to Plead Guilty, Serve 1 to 2 Years
 The Recorder
 It took seven years, but prosecutors are finally on the verge of putting famed plaintiffs lawyer William Lerach in federal prison. [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
“Taking into account developments after decisions G 2/12 and G 2/13 [“Broccoli I” and “Tomato I”] of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, the exception to patentability of essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals in Article 53(b) EPC has a negative effect on the allowability of product claims and product-by-process claims directed to plants, plant material or animals, if the claimed product is exclusively… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:05 am by Jon Gelman
Unlike a civil action, Workers’ Compensation claims must be filed within the procedural limitations of the NJ 2-year statute of limitations and are not tolled by infancy. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:39 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 1983 claim, but does not cite 42 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:54 am

 2007 Both Houses Bills, With a 8-Day Date Range , Word Search: correction adj3 law Sorted by Last Action Date
 Search Results Count = 30
 Run Date: 04/23/07 08:23 AM 
 Last Action Date: 04/16/07(Results Count = 2) 
 Bill No. [read post]