Search for: "Does 2-13" Results 161 - 180 of 19,884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 3:19 am by Erika Birg
The new law is codified at O.C.G.A. 13-8-50 et seq. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 5:25 pm by Richard West
Forbes Advisor. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/debt-relief/does-bankruptcy-clear-tax-debt/[2] Offer in Compromise | Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:13 am
(Media & Arts Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 218, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The Board does not agree with the examining division that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is excluded from patentability and concurs with the appellant that the invention as claimed does not relate to purely abstract subject-matter in the meaning of Articles 52(2) and (3) EPC, but does have a technical character. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm by Andrew Langille
The panel addressed tweets (1), (2), and (3) separately from tweet (4).Unclear Implications: Does the Charter Apply to Universities in Ontario? [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:00 pm
Measure 2 would, depending on the perspective, be an $800 million blow to essential government services or merely the latest of a long string of sensible taxpayer restraints on property taxation in the footsteps of California's Proposition 13, Massachusetts's Proposition 2-1/2, and recent property tax caps in Indiana, New Jersey, and New York. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:00 pm
Measure 2 would, depending on the perspective, be an $800 million blow to essential government services or merely the latest of a long string of sensible taxpayer restraints on property taxation in the footsteps of California's Proposition 13, Massachusetts's Proposition 2-1/2, and recent property tax caps in Indiana, New Jersey, and New York. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm by fcoxwell
For vehicles – you must have purchased them more than 2 1/2 years prior to your bankruptcy in order to “cram down” to value. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Similarly, on page 103, Nitta teaches a separate power source SP for delivery of power to the wire feeder.For these reasons, we do not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 12 and claims 13-17 which depend therefrom.As a footnote to the case, note the point about provisional double-patenting rejections: Claim 1 of copending Application No. 11/609,871 was amended on July 2, 2010, after the Examiner’s rejection that is the subject of this appeal (see Office Action… [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Grain Processing Corp., No. 13-0723 (June 13, 2014), holding that neither the Clean Air Act nor Iowa's analogous state act pre-empted similar state law claims. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus,for the same reasons and because the Examiner has not shown that Tojowould remedy the deficiencies noted above regarding Simister, we also donot sustain the rejection of claims 2, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, and 19 under 35U.S.C. [read post]