Search for: "Does I through X"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 10:49 am
I'm willing to give the new X-Men prequel a go. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
I read Democracy in America many decades ago, and I’m still working through how to translate its themes to modern living. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
Just because the court has authority to do X does not justify X. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:59 am
Investors will vet and vet again–in a much deeper way than any investment banker does. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:57 pm
The triage attendant does not deserve to be paid, nor the X-ray technician They took all of my insurance info and billing info before I ever got an xray. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:35 am
The X Factor is a reality TV singing contest programme and franchise created by producer Simon Cowell, as I am sure readers are aware since the TV Format now airs in over 50 countries. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 am
I want to focus on one simple question: Has anybody noticed that the government's arguments in Cienega X and Rose Acre Farms VI do away with temporary takings? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 10:39 am
The post I Have Lupus. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:33 pm
Paul’s post begins after the first row of x's and after the second row I present my own comments in response.Any reader who has a confrontation-related message too long for the comments section of the blog is welcome to submit it to me; so long as it is appropriate for the blog, I I will post it.x x x x x xI take the position that only hearsay that is created by sufficiently coercive government conduct is barred by… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
The court says the tweeter does any “transmitting,” not Twitter or the viewer. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:24 pm
This seems like a minor capability, but I’ve already used it a few times and it really does make event scheduling faster and easier. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:12 am
Adding more support to my common sense point about the "structured settlement factoring vig" is a story I recently heard from one of my sources. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
What's more, applying the exclusio unius presumption (that when Congress specifies X we can assume that it meant not to specify X elsewhere) to a statute as long and complicated as the ACA -- and one that did not go through the usual linguistic "clean up" process in Conference (as I wrote here) does a disservice to textualism and all those who have defended it over the years--turning it into a wooden unreasonable… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:49 pm
Soon after I posted, a reader asked whether introducing those records through an affidavit from a records custodian violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him or her. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm
In August 2016, I was in the process of undergoing gender-affirming care through a series of medical treatments. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:22 am
If she is employed but her employer does not offer an employee plan (an option open to Conestoga Wood, as I have explained at length in many posts), she will receive the benefit in an exchange plan, subsidized if necessary by the government. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:27 pm
An important question is then: what causes us to accept mechanism X or institution Z as legitimate? [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
Bill runs a red light and hits Joan, who was proceeding lawfully through the intersection in her car. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:04 am
It still does. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm
One which purported to sell x-ray glasses, which would allow the user to see through things. [read post]
