Search for: "Does I through X" Results 101 - 120 of 3,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2013, 5:55 am by Ashley Deeks
” That is, the United States seems here to suggest that it will only consider AQ activity in State X to be part of the larger non-international conflict with AQ – and thus potentially render targetable those members of AQ present in State X – when (a) AQ has a significant and organized presence in State X; (b) AQ members are planning attacks from within State X; and (c) the attacks that they are planning are directed against U.S. persons and… [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:51 am
(In order to understand fully how the analysis produces its results, I highly recommend that those who have the time run through this interactive simulation of the process of gel electrophoresis in the lab.) [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
 It broadens the anti-SLAPP statute, and I think it does so in a beneficial way. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:33 pm
  I am minding my own business with what I think is a $50 million painting by Artist X hanging on my wall. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:00 am
Does this constitute enough evidence to prove infidelity? [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
Life is, after all, a short ride on a rock hurtling through space. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Having worked through section 704(b) special allocations, the class turns to section 704(c). [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:34 pm by familoo
They don’t let the light sabers through the x-ray machine at the court security desk, and you have to take your scary black helmet off before they’ll let you through, but the personalities are much the same (cry if you can, squawk if you must). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:03 pm by Camilla Hrdy
, and (4) does the public interest weigh in favor of an injunction? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:42 am by Tessa Shepperson
One of our Landlord Law landlords, who I will call Mr X,  has asked, on our Members Forum, about a ‘compliance fee’ charged by his letting agent. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:21 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: I-485 adjustment of status / I-140 / EB-11 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability) CLIENT: Chinese LOCATION: Cleveland, Ohio Our client contacted us in May 2014 about the possibility of getting an immigrant visa through the EB-11 category. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:44 am by Brett McDonnell
  One element of Title II that I really like is its push to punish the officers of failed companies, through firing and restitution. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:16 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If G had sold her 1984 Ford (or any of the replacement cars) and used the proceeds to buy shares in a mutual fund, which she owned at death, subsection (a)(5) does not give X the shares in the mutual fund. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:45 am by Robert Ambrogi
I could find nothing about this on the company’s website so I submitted the question through its support site and will let you know what I find out. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:22 am
Readers may go through this 23 page order for more detailed reasoning but I offer some quick comments. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
Atrios writes: I'm quite happy for people to criticize Obama for failing to be whatever they want him to be, I'm just rather tired of the "I know you think/thought X but you are/were wrong!!! [read post]
14 May 2023, 2:31 pm by Joseph Fishkin
And at the end I’ll also explain what all this has to do with constitutional political economy.Background AssumptionsThroughout this discussion of the available options, my assumption is that literally anything that the Biden Administration does on the “x-date” (including doing nothing) will be the subject of a large volume of immediate and frantic litigation. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:48 pm by Mark Tushnet
And, unlike some of my other speculations about innovative political moves (such as the creation of formal government coalitions crossing party lines), there don't seem to be structural reasons standing in the way.What does stand in the way, of course, is ego -- or, more politely, an often well grounded judgment by second-tier candidates (and even more so by some first-tier candidates): A person approached by candidate X to become a member of the shadow Cabinet will think,… [read post]