Search for: "Does I-XX"
Results 61 - 80
of 404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2022, 3:29 am
Does the U.S. think that some or all of these measures should be found not to violate Article III:4, or should be considered to fall within the Article XX exception? [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:29 am
Does the U.S. think that some or all of these measures should be found not to violate Article III:4, or should be considered to fall within the Article XX exception? [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 5:02 pm
I see no textual reason for Article XX to apply differently to violations of Article III as opposed to Article. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:53 am
I don't hear much talk in the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:04 pm
Canada has made claims under GATT Articles I, III:4, V and XI:1. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:50 pm
But it's worth noting that Article XX does not always use "necessary," sometimes using "relating to" or other formulations. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:56 am
What should I do when signing a contract? [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:18 am
According to the Shrimp-Turtle jurisprudence, the legal obstacle for a country wishing to impose a ban on imports on environmental grounds by invoking Article XX of GATT 94 does not come from the fact that the natural resources that it wants to protect are located outside its jurisdiction or the fact that it invokes unilaterally decided environmental standards. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:03 am
Why does this have anything to do with eggs? [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
But, given their specific aims and the case law on the meaning of XX(g), measures in question clearly fall within XX(g) of the GATT not XX(a), based on a reading of those provisions that follows Vienna Convention Article 31. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 9:05 am
Specifically, Mexico invoked Articles XX(a) and XX(g): 1. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 9:05 am
Specifically, Mexico invoked Articles XX(a) and XX(g): 1. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:21 am
I support the environmental benefits that come from decreased dependence on cars. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:01 am
I'm not really sure that it does much of anything. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:52 am
[i] Taken alone, it would seem obvious that the DBA does not apply to this project. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:09 pm
The Protocol does not contain any general policy exception, and China invoked GATT Article XX(a) as a defense for its apparent breach of the trading rights obligation. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:10 am
XX or GATS Art. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 12:39 pm
Yes, professors like me are employed by "the State of Florida," but that does not mean that we are supposed to do what the governor tells us to do, as if he were our boss in a typical workplace. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:04 am
Howse, Sykes, and I responded to this argument at length in our amicus brief filed in the Seal Products dispute. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
Pro. 68(d)[xx]Andretti v. [read post]
