Search for: "Dolan v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:51 am
Dolan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
Adler) Among the four decisions handed down today was Dolan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:14 am
., LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:05 am
United States, No. 09-367. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
United States, 560 U.S. 605, 618 (2010). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Code, § 66000 et seq.) and the takings clause of the United States Constitution, namely the special application of the “unconstitutional conditions doctrine” in the context of land use exactions established in Nollan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:50 pm
Quon (argued today) and Dolan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:53 am
City of San Jose, et al., (2016) On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States denied the California Building Industry’s petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the decision of the California Supreme Court in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
Dolan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:21 pm
The case page for United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 1:54 am
Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 4:59 am
On appeal, Sheetz contended reversal was required because the TIM fee is invalid under both the Mitigation Fee Act and the takings clause of the United States constitution. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
These limits are referred to as the “nexus” and “rough proportionality” standards set forth in the well-known United States Supreme Court cases of Nollan v. [read post]
